These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1675716)
41. Report of the "ad hoc" committee on mammography rapport du comite "ad hoc" sur la mammographie. Léger JL; Naimark AP; Béique RA; McFarlane DV; Miller S; Miller AB J Can Assoc Radiol; 1974 Mar; 25(1):3-21. PubMed ID: 4595875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Strong support for regular mammograms. Health News; 2001 Jun; 7(6):6. PubMed ID: 11851171 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. [Role of mammography in the early diagnosis of breast carcinoma]. Franceschi S Riv Inferm; 1984 Dec; 3(4):274-9. PubMed ID: 6443044 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Updated results of the trials of screening mammography. Kopans DB Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 1997 Apr; 6(2):233-63. PubMed ID: 9115494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Owen G CMAJ; 1993 Mar; 148(6):877, 880; 880-3. PubMed ID: 8166772 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Implications of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Miller AB Womens Health (Lond); 2014 Jul; 10(4):345-7. PubMed ID: 25259895 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. The Canadian National Breast Screening Study: a critical review. Kopans DB; Feig SA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Oct; 161(4):755-60. PubMed ID: 8372752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Screening mammography at 40-49 years: regret or no regret? Djulbegovic B; Lyman GH Lancet; 2006 Dec; 368(9552):2035-7. PubMed ID: 17161713 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. The Canadian National Breast Screening Study: a Canadian critique. Burhenne LJ; Burhenne HJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Oct; 161(4):761-3. PubMed ID: 8372753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Comment on the Elwood Paper. Kopans DB Online J Curr Clin Trials; 1993 Mar; Doc No 42():[1687 words; 8 paragraphs]. PubMed ID: 8117361 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Reducing deaths from breast cancer in Canada. Simor IS; Jong RA CMAJ; 1990 Feb; 142(4):285-7. PubMed ID: 2302623 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. How should I respond to clinicians who ask me about breast cancer screening for women 40-50 years of age? Kopans DB AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Dec; 163(6):1524-5. PubMed ID: 7992760 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. By the way, doctor. A few months ago, I was surprised to read that a new study has raised a question about the value of screening mammograms. Is that true? I thought the importance of having such mammograms was well-established. I'm 52 and have been getting annual mammograms for 10 years. Should I stop? Robb-Nicholson C Harv Womens Health Watch; 2002 Mar; 9(7):8. PubMed ID: 11916658 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. On being the right size: a reappraisal of mammography trials in Canada and Sweden. Narod SA Lancet; 1997 Jun; 349(9068):1846. PubMed ID: 9269247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Screening for breast cancer in the under 50s. Alexander FE; Chamberlain J; Forrest AP Lancet; 1993 May; 341(8853):1149. PubMed ID: 8097826 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Mammography and women under 50: déjà vu all over again? Stefanek ME; Gritz ER; Vernon SW Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2010 Mar; 19(3):635-9. PubMed ID: 20200433 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Mammography. Swift M Lancet; 1992 Dec 19-26; 340(8834-8835):1538; author reply 1539-40. PubMed ID: 1361615 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Mammography. Vallgårda S Lancet; 1992 Dec 19-26; 340(8834-8835):1538-9; author reply 1539-40. PubMed ID: 1361616 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Time to halt an out of control trial with ineffective oversight. Bewley S; Rose L; Gøtzsche P; Blennerhassett M; Colquhoun D; Pryke M; Tindall G; Braillon A; Richmond C; Illman J; May J BMJ; 2014 Sep; 349():g5601. PubMed ID: 25232068 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]