These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1675716)

  • 61. Controversies in breast cancer screening.
    Miller AB
    Cancer Prev Control; 1997; 1(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 9765730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Screening mammography.
    Roebuck DJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Apr; 166(4):990. PubMed ID: 8610590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Assessment of the recent consensus development panel on screening women aged 40-49 for breast cancer.
    Monsees BS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Sep; 169(3):625-6. PubMed ID: 9275866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Controversies in mammography.
    Schechter S; Zuckerman HC
    Cancer Invest; 1984; 2(2):125-48. PubMed ID: 6733560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. "Should I have a mammogram?" Handout helps women decide.
    Hahn DL
    J Fam Pract; 2007 Jul; 56(7):518-21. PubMed ID: 17612031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Mammography in women under age 30: is there clinical benefit?
    Hall FM
    Radiology; 1987 Feb; 162(2):582. PubMed ID: 3797678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Assessing the risk of breast cancer.
    Spratt JS
    N Engl J Med; 2000 Jun; 342(26):2002; author reply 2002-3. PubMed ID: 10877663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Screening versus diagnostic mammography.
    Berlin L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jul; 173(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 10397089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Europeans say screen only women age 50 and older.
    Vanchieri C
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1993 Mar; 85(5):350. PubMed ID: 8433387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. The Welbeck memorial lecture 1988. Radiology and breast cancer.
    Forrest P
    Radiogr Today; 1989 May; 55(624):13-20. PubMed ID: 2590429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Breast screening.
    Wright CJ
    Lancet; 1992 Jul; 340(8811):122. PubMed ID: 1351996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Re: "Author of Canadian breast cancer study retracts warnings".
    Miller AB
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1992 Sep; 84(17):1365-70. PubMed ID: 1495109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. NBSS: opportunity to compromise the process.
    Kopans DB
    CMAJ; 1997 Aug; 157(3):247-8. PubMed ID: 9269190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Informed medical decisions.
    Slawson DC
    Arch Fam Med; 1993 Aug; 2(8):813. PubMed ID: 8111506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Case 15-2010: Mammography in elderly women.
    Keen JD
    N Engl J Med; 2010 Sep; 363(13):1288; author reply 1288. PubMed ID: 20860516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. CAR ad hoc committee for mammography accreditation.
    Hutton LC
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1992 Jun; 43(3):168-9. PubMed ID: 1596758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Mammography.
    Pitcher M; Allan S; Baum M
    Lancet; 1992 Dec 19-26; 340(8834-8835):1539-40. PubMed ID: 1361617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Mammography trial comes under fire.
    Allison M
    Science; 1992 May; 256(5060):1128-30. PubMed ID: 1589786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Patients' understanding of clinical trials.
    Thornton H
    Lancet; 1998 Jul; 352(9121):72. PubMed ID: 9800786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Assessing the risk of breast cancer.
    Rhoads CS; Elmore JG; Fletcher S
    N Engl J Med; 2000 Jun; 342(26):2002; author reply 2002-3. PubMed ID: 10877661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.