274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16757502)
21. Dressing disruption is a major risk factor for catheter-related infections.
Timsit JF; Bouadma L; Ruckly S; Schwebel C; Garrouste-Orgeas M; Bronchard R; Calvino-Gunther S; Laupland K; Adrie C; Thuong M; Herault MC; Pease S; Arrault X; Lucet JC
Crit Care Med; 2012 Jun; 40(6):1707-14. PubMed ID: 22488003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prevention of intravascular catheter infection.
Eggimann P
Curr Opin Infect Dis; 2007 Aug; 20(4):360-9. PubMed ID: 17609594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prevention of central venous catheter related infections with chlorhexidine gluconate impregnated wound dressings: a randomized controlled trial.
Ruschulte H; Franke M; Gastmeier P; Zenz S; Mahr KH; Buchholz S; Hertenstein B; Hecker H; Piepenbrock S
Ann Hematol; 2009 Mar; 88(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 18679683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dressing and securement for central venous access devices (CVADs): A Cochrane systematic review.
Ullman AJ; Cooke ML; Mitchell M; Lin F; New K; Long DA; Mihala G; Rickard CM
Int J Nurs Stud; 2016 Jul; 59():177-96. PubMed ID: 27222463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effectiveness of chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine impregnated central venous catheters in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy followed by peripheral stem cell transplantation.
Maaskant JM; De Boer JP; Dalesio O; Holtkamp MJ; Lucas C
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2009 Sep; 18(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 19453696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A fall in bloodstream infections followed a change to 2% chlorhexidine in 70% isopropanol for catheter connection antisepsis: a pediatric single center before/after study on a hemopoietic stem cell transplant ward.
Soothill JS; Bravery K; Ho A; Macqueen S; Collins J; Lock P
Am J Infect Control; 2009 Oct; 37(8):626-30. PubMed ID: 19616869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of chlorhexidine impregnated dressing and standard dressing for the prevention of central-line associated blood stream infection and colonization in critically ill pediatric patients: A randomized controlled trial.
Duyu M; Karakaya Z; Yazici P; Yavuz S; Yersel NM; Tascilar MO; Firat N; Bozkurt O; Caglar Mocan Y
Pediatr Int; 2022 Jan; 64(1):e15011. PubMed ID: 34610185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The impact of exit-site care and catheter design on the incidence of catheter-related infections.
Jones LL; Tweedy L; Warady BA
Adv Perit Dial; 1995; 11():302-5. PubMed ID: 8534730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Reduced colonization and infection with miconazole-rifampicin modified central venous catheters: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Yücel N; Lefering R; Maegele M; Max M; Rossaint R; Koch A; Schwarz R; Korenkov M; Beuth J; Bach A; Schierholz J; Pulverer G; Neugebauer EA
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2004 Dec; 54(6):1109-15. PubMed ID: 15537696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge versus chlorhexidine gel dressing for short-term intravascular catheters: which one is better?
Buetti N; Ruckly S; Schwebel C; Mimoz O; Souweine B; Lucet JC; Timsit JF
Crit Care; 2020 Jul; 24(1):458. PubMed ID: 32703235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Are antiseptic-coated central venous catheters effective in a real-world setting?
Borschel DM; Chenoweth CE; Kaufman SR; Hyde KV; VanDerElzen KA; Raghunathan TE; Collins CD; Saint S
Am J Infect Control; 2006 Aug; 34(6):388-93. PubMed ID: 16877109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Efficacy of antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infection: a meta-analysis.
Veenstra DL; Saint S; Saha S; Lumley T; Sullivan SD
JAMA; 1999 Jan; 281(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 9918482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cost-benefit analysis of chlorhexidine gluconate dressing in the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections.
Crawford AG; Fuhr JP; Rao B
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2004 Aug; 25(8):668-74. PubMed ID: 15357159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Impact of central venous catheter type and methods on catheter-related colonization and bacteraemia.
Moretti EW; Ofstead CL; Kristy RM; Wetzler HP
J Hosp Infect; 2005 Oct; 61(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 16026898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Prevention of central venous catheter-related infections: what works other than impregnated or coated catheters?
Mermel LA
J Hosp Infect; 2007 Jun; 65 Suppl 2():30-3. PubMed ID: 17540238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect of the biopatch, a chlorhexidine impregnated dressing, on bacterial colonization of epidural catheter exit sites.
Mann TJ; Orlikowski CE; Gurrin LC; Keil AD
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2001 Dec; 29(6):600-3. PubMed ID: 11771602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Vascular catheter site care: the clinical and economic benefits of chlorhexidine gluconate compared with povidone iodine.
Chaiyakunapruk N; Veenstra DL; Lipsky BA; Sullivan SD; Saint S
Clin Infect Dis; 2003 Sep; 37(6):764-71. PubMed ID: 12955636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Use of a chlorhexidine-impregnated patch does not decrease the incidence of bacterial colonization of femoral nerve catheters: a randomized trial.
Schroeder KM; Jacobs RA; Guite C; Gassner K; Anderson B; Donnelly MJ
Can J Anaesth; 2012 Oct; 59(10):950-7. PubMed ID: 22855310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Antimicrobial activity of a chlorhexidine intravascular catheter site gel dressing.
Karpanen TJ; Casey AL; Conway BR; Lambert PA; Elliott TS
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2011 Aug; 66(8):1777-84. PubMed ID: 21609979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Chlorhexidine gluconate dressings reduce bacterial colonization rates in epidural and peripheral regional catheters.
Kerwat K; Eberhart L; Kerwat M; Hörth D; Wulf H; Steinfeldt T; Wiesmann T
Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():149785. PubMed ID: 25879016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
