692 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16757702)
1. Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of screening mammography.
Stout NK; Rosenberg MA; Trentham-Dietz A; Smith MA; Robinson SM; Fryback DG
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Jun; 98(11):774-82. PubMed ID: 16757702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts.
Sprague BL; Stout NK; Schechter C; van Ravesteyn NT; Cevik M; Alagoz O; Lee CI; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Mandelblatt JS; de Koning HJ; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD; Tosteson AN
Ann Intern Med; 2015 Feb; 162(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 25486550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Benefits, harms, and costs for breast cancer screening after US implementation of digital mammography.
Stout NK; Lee SJ; Schechter CB; Kerlikowske K; Alagoz O; Berry D; Buist DS; Cevik M; Chisholm G; de Koning HJ; Huang H; Hubbard RA; Miglioretti DL; Munsell MF; Trentham-Dietz A; van Ravesteyn NT; Tosteson AN; Mandelblatt JS
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Jun; 106(6):dju092. PubMed ID: 24872543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness.
Schousboe JT; Kerlikowske K; Loh A; Cummings SR
Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 21727289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic versus organised mammography screening in Switzerland.
de Gelder R; Bulliard JL; de Wolf C; Fracheboud J; Draisma G; Schopper D; de Koning HJ
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Jan; 45(1):127-38. PubMed ID: 19038540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India.
Okonkwo QL; Draisma G; der Kinderen A; Brown ML; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1290-300. PubMed ID: 18780864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness analysis of mammography and clinical breast examination strategies: a comparison with current guidelines.
Ahern CH; Shen Y
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2009 Mar; 18(3):718-25. PubMed ID: 19258473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of Population-Wide Genomic Screening for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer in the United States.
Guzauskas GF; Garbett S; Zhou Z; Spencer SJ; Smith HS; Hao J; Hassen D; Snyder SR; Graves JA; Peterson JF; Williams MS; Veenstra DL
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Oct; 3(10):e2022874. PubMed ID: 33119106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of alternative practices on the cost and quality of mammographic screening in the United States.
Burnside E; Belkora J; Esserman L
Clin Breast Cancer; 2001 Jul; 2(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 11899786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a quality-controlled mammography screening program from the Swiss statutory health-care perspective: quantitative assessment of the most influential factors.
Neeser K; Szucs T; Bulliard JL; Bachmann G; Schramm W
Value Health; 2007; 10(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 17261115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Economic evaluation of the breast cancer screening programme in the Basque Country: retrospective cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis.
Arrospide A; Rue M; van Ravesteyn NT; Comas M; Soto-Gordoa M; Sarriugarte G; Mar J
BMC Cancer; 2016 Jun; 16():344. PubMed ID: 27251556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography breast cancer screening.
Tosteson AN; Stout NK; Fryback DG; Acharyya S; Herman BA; Hannah LG; Pisano ED;
Ann Intern Med; 2008 Jan; 148(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 18166758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost effectiveness of the NHS breast screening programme: life table model.
Pharoah PD; Sewell B; Fitzsimmons D; Bennett HS; Pashayan N
BMJ; 2013 May; 346():f2618. PubMed ID: 23661112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammography utilization, public health impact, and cost-effectiveness in the United States.
White E; Urban N; Taylor V
Annu Rev Public Health; 1993; 14():605-33. PubMed ID: 8323604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a Stratified National Breast Screening Program in the United Kingdom: An Early Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Gray E; Donten A; Karssemeijer N; van Gils C; Evans DG; Astley S; Payne K
Value Health; 2017 Sep; 20(8):1100-1109. PubMed ID: 28964442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Incorporating Baseline Breast Density When Screening Women at Average Risk for Breast Cancer : A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Shih YT; Dong W; Xu Y; Etzioni R; Shen Y
Ann Intern Med; 2021 May; 174(5):602-612. PubMed ID: 33556275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of breast MR imaging and screen-film mammography for screening BRCA1 gene mutation carriers.
Lee JM; McMahon PM; Kong CY; Kopans DB; Ryan PD; Ozanne EM; Halpern EF; Gazelle GS
Radiology; 2010 Mar; 254(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 20177093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening in women on dialysis.
Wong G; Howard K; Chapman JR; Craig JC
Am J Kidney Dis; 2008 Nov; 52(5):916-29. PubMed ID: 18789566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness of MRI compared to mammography for breast cancer screening in a high risk population.
Moore SG; Shenoy PJ; Fanucchi L; Tumeh JW; Flowers CR
BMC Health Serv Res; 2009 Jan; 9():9. PubMed ID: 19144138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Total cost-effectiveness of mammography screening strategies.
Mittmann N; Stout NK; Lee P; Tosteson AN; Trentham-Dietz A; Alagoz O; Yaffe MJ
Health Rep; 2015 Dec; 26(12):16-25. PubMed ID: 26676235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
