These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16758716)

  • 21. Towards a Holistic Model Explaining Hearing Protection Device Use among Workers.
    Doutres O; Terroir J; Jolly C; Gauvin C; Martin L; Negrini A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 May; 19(9):. PubMed ID: 35564973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Staging workers' use of hearing protection devices: application of the transtheoretical model.
    Raymond DM; Lusk SL
    AAOHN J; 2006 Apr; 54(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 16629006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hearing protection use in manufacturing workers: a qualitative study.
    Reddy RK; Welch D; Thorne P; Ameratunga S
    Noise Health; 2012; 14(59):202-9. PubMed ID: 22918151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Explaining Mexican American workers' hearing protection use with the health promotion model.
    Kerr MJ; Lusk SL; Ronis DL
    Nurs Res; 2002; 51(2):100-9. PubMed ID: 11984380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Noise induced hearing loss.
    Beckett WS
    J Occup Environ Med; 2003 Oct; 45(10):1029; author reply 1029. PubMed ID: 14534441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prevalence of hearing protection device non-use among noise-exposed US workers in 2007 and 2014.
    Green DR; Masterson EA; Themann CL
    Am J Ind Med; 2021 Dec; 64(12):1002-1017. PubMed ID: 34597431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fit-testing hearing protectors: an idea whose time has come.
    Hager LD
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):147-51. PubMed ID: 21368440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Noise and hearing protection: Latino construction workers' experiences.
    Robertson C; Kerr M; Garcia C; Halterman E
    AAOHN J; 2007 Apr; 55(4):153-60. PubMed ID: 17472130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Determinants of use of hearing protection devices in Canadian lumber mill workers.
    Sbihi H; Teschke K; MacNab YC; Davies HW
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Apr; 54(3):319-28. PubMed ID: 19570944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Indicators of hearing protection use: self-report and researcher observation.
    Griffin SC; Neitzel R; Daniell WE; Seixas NS
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2009 Oct; 6(10):639-47. PubMed ID: 19626532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss.
    Verbeek JH; Kateman E; Morata TC; Dreschler WA; Mischke C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Oct; 10():CD006396. PubMed ID: 23076923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation by industrial workers of passive and level-dependent hearing protection devices.
    Tufts JB; Hamilton MA; Ucci AJ; Rubas J
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(50):26-36. PubMed ID: 21173484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Understanding barriers to preventive health actions for occupational noise-induced hearing loss.
    Patel DS; Witte K; Zuckerman C; Murray-Johnson L; Orrego V; Maxfield AM; Meadows-Hogan S; Tisdale J; Thimons ED
    J Health Commun; 2001; 6(2):155-68. PubMed ID: 11405079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Development of the hearing protection assessment (HPA-2) questionnaire.
    Reddy R; Welch D; Ameratunga S; Thorne P
    Occup Med (Lond); 2014 Apr; 64(3):198-205. PubMed ID: 24514576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impact of daily noise exposure monitoring on occupational noise exposures in manufacturing workers.
    McTague MF; Galusha D; Dixon-Ernst C; Kirsche SR; Slade MD; Cullen MR; Rabinowitz PM
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Feb; 52 Suppl 1(0 1):S3-8. PubMed ID: 23373740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prevalence of hearing loss and accuracy of self-report among factory workers.
    McCullagh MC; Raymond D; Kerr MJ; Lusk SL
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(54):340-7. PubMed ID: 21959114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Too late smart: farmers' adoption of self-protective behaviors in response to exposure to hazardous noise.
    McCullagh M; Robertson C
    AAOHN J; 2009 Mar; 57(3):99-105. PubMed ID: 19338259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Evaluation for results of individual protection of workers exposed to noise].
    Yue PP; Yu WL; Wang JX
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2009 Feb; 27(2):85-6. PubMed ID: 19351472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Earplugs in Preventing Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in an Auto Parts Factory in China.
    Gong W; Zhao L; Li L; Morata TC; Qiu W; Feng HA; Zhu B
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul; 18(13):. PubMed ID: 34281127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Hearing protection. Didn't hear it coming ... noise and hearing in industrial accidents.
    Hager LD
    Occup Health Saf; 2002 Sep; 71(9):196-200. PubMed ID: 12369364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.