These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

389 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16759322)

  • 1. Comparison of articaine 4% and lidocaine 2% in paediatric dental patients.
    Ram D; Amir E
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2006 Jul; 16(4):252-6. PubMed ID: 16759322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine in achieving pulpal anesthesia in maxillary teeth with irreversible pulpitis.
    Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Meechan JG
    J Endod; 2012 Mar; 38(3):279-82. PubMed ID: 22341059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Articaine buccal infiltration enhances the effectiveness of lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block.
    Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Corbett IP; Meechan JG
    Int Endod J; 2009 Mar; 42(3):238-46. PubMed ID: 19228214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical efficacy of lidocaine, mepivacaine, and articaine for local infiltration.
    Srisurang S; Narit L; Prisana P
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 25427324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anesthetic efficacy of articaine and lidocaine for incisive/mental nerve block.
    Batista da Silva C; Berto LA; Volpato MC; Ramacciato JC; Motta RH; Ranali J; Groppo FC
    J Endod; 2010 Mar; 36(3):438-41. PubMed ID: 20171359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine when used as a supplemental anesthetic.
    Rosenberg PA; Amin KG; Zibari Y; Lin LM
    J Endod; 2007 Apr; 33(4):403-5. PubMed ID: 17368327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Injection pain of prilocaine plain, mepivacaine plain, articaine with epinephrine, and lidocaine with epinephrine.
    Wahl MJ; Schmitt MM; Overton DA
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 16776407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A prospective randomized trial of different supplementary local anesthetic techniques after failure of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis in mandibular teeth.
    Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Meechan JG
    J Endod; 2012 Apr; 38(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 22414822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Articaine hydrochloride: a study of the safety of a new amide local anesthetic.
    Malamed SF; Gagnon S; Leblanc D
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Feb; 132(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 11217590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of injection pain, heart rate increase, and postinjection pain of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.
    Nusstein J; Berlin J; Reader A; Beck M; Weaver JM
    Anesth Prog; 2004; 51(4):126-33. PubMed ID: 15675261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of injection pain with articaine with adrenaline, prilocaine with phenylpressin and lidocaine with adrenaline.
    Sumer M; Misir F; Celebi N; Muğlali M
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2008 Jul; 13(7):E427-30. PubMed ID: 18587306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of articaine: a new amide local anesthetic.
    Malamed SF; Gagnon S; Leblanc D
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 May; 131(5):635-42. PubMed ID: 10832257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine in block and infiltration anesthesia administered in teeth with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
    Ashraf H; Kazem M; Dianat O; Noghrehkar F
    J Endod; 2013 Jan; 39(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 23228249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of articaine and mepivacaine in pediatric patients: a randomized, double-blind study.
    Odabaş ME; Cınar C; Deveci C; Alaçam A
    Pediatr Dent; 2012; 34(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 22353456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The efficacy and safety of articaine versus lignocaine in dental treatments: a meta-analysis.
    Katyal V
    J Dent; 2010 Apr; 38(4):307-17. PubMed ID: 20006669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical use of an epinephrine-reduced (1/400,000) articaine solution in short-time dental routine treatments--a multicenter study.
    Daubländer M; Kämmerer PW; Willershausen B; Leckel M; Lauer HC; Buff S; Rösl B
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1289-95. PubMed ID: 21861074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Onset and duration periods of articaine and lidocaine on maxillary infiltration.
    Costa CG; Tortamano IP; Rocha RG; Francischone CE; Tortamano N
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Mar; 36(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 15887505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison between articaine HCl and lidocaine HCl in pediatric dental patients.
    Malamed SF; Gagnon S; Leblanc D
    Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 10969438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine in a Primary Intraseptal Injection: A Prospective, Randomized Double-Blind Study.
    Bonar T; Nusstein J; Reader A; Drum M; Fowler S; Beck M
    Anesth Prog; 2017; 64(4):203-211. PubMed ID: 29200372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of articaine 4% and lignocaine 2% in block and infiltration analgesia in children.
    Arrow P
    Aust Dent J; 2012 Sep; 57(3):325-33. PubMed ID: 22924356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.