These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

373 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16759624)

  • 1. Assessing the influence of schematic drawings of body parts on tactile discrimination performance using the crossmodal congruency task.
    Igarashi Y; Kitagawa N; Spence C; Ichihara S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Feb; 124(2):190-208. PubMed ID: 16759624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The selective effect of the image of a hand on visuotactile interactions as assessed by performance on the crossmodal congruency task.
    Igarashi Y; Kimura Y; Spence C; Ichihara S
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 184(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 17726605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal aspects of the visuotactile congruency effect.
    Shore DI; Barnes ME; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Jan; 392(1-2):96-100. PubMed ID: 16213655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the inability to ignore touch when responding to vision in the crossmodal congruency task.
    Spence C; Walton M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005; 118(1-2):47-70. PubMed ID: 15627409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multisensory contributions to the 3-D representation of visuotactile peripersonal space in humans: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task.
    Spence C; Pavani F; Maravita A; Holmes N
    J Physiol Paris; 2004; 98(1-3):171-89. PubMed ID: 15477031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Seeing the body modulates audiotactile integration.
    Aspell JE; Lavanchy T; Lenggenhager B; Blanke O
    Eur J Neurosci; 2010 May; 31(10):1868-73. PubMed ID: 20584191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Crossmodal congruency measures of lateral distance effects on the rubber hand illusion.
    Zopf R; Savage G; Williams MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Feb; 48(3):713-25. PubMed ID: 19913040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tactile remapping beyond space.
    Azañón E; Camacho K; Soto-Faraco S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2010 May; 31(10):1858-67. PubMed ID: 20584190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lost in the move? Secondary task performance impairs tactile change detection on the body.
    Gallace A; Zeeden S; Röder B; Spence C
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):215-29. PubMed ID: 19647451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vision and touch in ageing: crossmodal selective attention and visuotactile spatial interactions.
    Poliakoff E; Ashworth S; Lowe C; Spence C
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):507-17. PubMed ID: 16098997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How attentional systems process conflicting cues. The superiority of social over symbolic orienting revisited.
    Nummenmaa L; Hietanen JK
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1738-54. PubMed ID: 19968432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Crossmodal congruency effects based on stimulus identity.
    Frings C; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2010 Oct; 1354():113-22. PubMed ID: 20674555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visuotactile temporal order judgments in ageing.
    Poliakoff E; Shore DI; Lowe C; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Apr; 396(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 16356634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
    Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differential effects of synchronous and asynchronous multifinger coactivation on human tactile performance.
    Kalisch T; Tegenthoff M; Dinse HR
    BMC Neurosci; 2007 Jul; 8():58. PubMed ID: 17663778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Action goal selection and motor planning can be dissociated by tool use.
    Collins T; Schicke T; Röder B
    Cognition; 2008 Dec; 109(3):363-71. PubMed ID: 19012884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vision of a pictorial hand modulates visual-tactile interactions.
    Igarashi Y; Kitagawa N; Ichihara S
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2004 Jun; 4(2):182-92. PubMed ID: 15460924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of visual threat on spatial attention to touch.
    Poliakoff E; Miles E; Li X; Blanchette I
    Cognition; 2007 Mar; 102(3):405-14. PubMed ID: 16500638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extending visual dominance over touch for input off the body.
    Hartcher-O'Brien J; Levitan C; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2010 Nov; 1362():48-55. PubMed ID: 20850418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.