BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16759831)

  • 1. LoComatioN: a software tool for the analysis of low copy number DNA profiles.
    Gill P; Kirkham A; Curran J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Mar; 166(2-3):128-38. PubMed ID: 16759831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interpretation of repeat measurement DNA evidence allowing for multiple contributors and population substructure.
    Curran JM; Gill P; Bill MR
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Feb; 148(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 15607589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Towards understanding the effect of uncertainty in the number of contributors to DNA stains.
    Buckleton JS; Curran JM; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Mar; 1(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 19083724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The probability of achieving full allelic representation for LCN-STR profiling of haploid cells.
    Lucy D; Curran JM; Pirie AA; Gill P
    Sci Justice; 2007 Dec; 47(4):168-71. PubMed ID: 18229758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Direct comparison of post-28-cycle PCR purification and modified capillary electrophoresis methods with the 34-cycle "low copy number" (LCN) method for analysis of trace forensic DNA samples.
    Forster L; Thomson J; Kutranov S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Sep; 2(4):318-28. PubMed ID: 19083842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Application of MiniFiler kit in forensic DNA testing of low copy number template].
    Tang JP; Wu D; Zhang C; Zhou HG
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 23(4):304-6. PubMed ID: 17896528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interpretation of complex DNA profiles using empirical models and a method to measure their robustness.
    Gill P; Curran J; Neumann C; Kirkham A; Clayton T; Whitaker J; Lambert J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Mar; 2(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 19083804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Short tandem repeat (STR) genotyping of keratinised hair. Part 2. An optimised genomic DNA extraction procedure reveals donor dependence of STR profiles.
    McNevin D; Wilson-Wilde L; Robertson J; Kyd J; Lennard C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Oct; 153(2-3):247-59. PubMed ID: 15998572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Least-square deconvolution: a framework for interpreting short tandem repeat mixtures.
    Wang T; Xue N; Birdwell JD
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Nov; 51(6):1284-97. PubMed ID: 17199614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An investigation of the robustness of the consensus method of interpreting low-template DNA profiles.
    Cowen S; Debenham P; Dixon A; Kutranov S; Thomson J; Way K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Nov; 5(5):400-6. PubMed ID: 20952266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. EuroForMix: An open source software based on a continuous model to evaluate STR DNA profiles from a mixture of contributors with artefacts.
    Bleka Ø; Storvik G; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():35-44. PubMed ID: 26720812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating the probability of allelic drop-out of STR alleles in forensic genetics.
    Tvedebrink T; Eriksen PS; Mogensen HS; Morling N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):222-6. PubMed ID: 19647706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simplified low-copy-number DNA analysis by post-PCR purification.
    Smith PJ; Ballantyne J
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jul; 52(4):820-9. PubMed ID: 17553095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mixture interpretation: defining the relevant features for guidelines for the assessment of mixed DNA profiles in forensic casework.
    Budowle B; Onorato AJ; Callaghan TF; Della Manna A; Gross AM; Guerrieri RA; Luttman JC; McClure DL
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Jul; 54(4):810-21. PubMed ID: 19368620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the interpretation of mixtures.
    Gill P; Brenner CH; Buckleton JS; Carracedo A; Krawczak M; Mayr WR; Morling N; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Weir BS;
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jul; 160(2-3):90-101. PubMed ID: 16750605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exploratory data analysis for the interpretation of low template DNA mixtures.
    Haned H; Slooten K; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):762-74. PubMed ID: 22981542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comment on "A universal strategy to interpret DNA profiles that does not require a definition of low copy number" by Peter Gill and John Buckleton, 2010, Forensic Sci. Int. Genetics 4, 221-227.
    Budowle B; van Daal A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Jan; 5(1):15. PubMed ID: 20457107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A universal strategy to interpret DNA profiles that does not require a definition of low-copy-number.
    Gill P; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2010 Jul; 4(4):221-7. PubMed ID: 20457049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. PENDULUM--a guideline-based approach to the interpretation of STR mixtures.
    Bill M; Gill P; Curran J; Clayton T; Pinchin R; Healy M; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Mar; 148(2-3):181-9. PubMed ID: 15639613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comment on "Low copy number typing has yet to achieve "general acceptance"" by Budowle, B., et al., 2009. Forensic Sci. Int. Genetics: Supplement Series 2, 551-552.
    Caragine T; Prinz M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Jan; 5(1):3-4; discussion 5-7. PubMed ID: 20457110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.