These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16760563)

  • 1. The influence of different playing surfaces on the biomechanics of a tennis running forehand foot plant.
    Stiles VH; Dixon SJ
    J Appl Biomech; 2006 Feb; 22(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 16760563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical response to systematic changes in impact interface cushioning properties while performing a tennis-specific movement.
    Stiles V; Dixon S
    J Sports Sci; 2007 Sep; 25(11):1229-39. PubMed ID: 17654235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of surface traction characteristics on frictional demand and kinematics in tennis.
    Damm L; Low D; Richardson A; Clarke J; Carré M; Dixon S
    Sports Biomech; 2013 Nov; 12(4):389-402. PubMed ID: 24466651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Joint and plantar loading in table tennis topspin forehand with different footwork.
    Lam WK; Fan JX; Zheng Y; Lee WC
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2019 May; 19(4):471-479. PubMed ID: 30362890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of required coefficient of friction in running and walking.
    Vidal AB; Monezi LA; Sarro KJ; Barros RML
    Sports Biomech; 2021 Sep; 20(6):768-780. PubMed ID: 31070107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of the forehand stance on knee biomechanics: Implications for potential injury risks in tennis players.
    Martin C; Sorel A; Touzard P; Bideau B; Gaborit R; DeGroot H; Kulpa R
    J Sports Sci; 2021 May; 39(9):992-1000. PubMed ID: 33283656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical responses to changes in friction on a clay court surface.
    Starbuck C; Stiles V; Urà D; Carré M; Dixon S
    J Sci Med Sport; 2017 May; 20(5):459-463. PubMed ID: 27692798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of tennis court surfaces on player perceptions and biomechanical response.
    Starbuck C; Damm L; Clarke J; Carré M; Capel-Davis J; Miller S; Stiles V; Dixon S
    J Sports Sci; 2016 Sep; 34(17):1627-36. PubMed ID: 26699792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of shoe drop on the kinematics and kinetics of children tennis players.
    Herbaut A; Chavet P; Roux M; Guéguen N; Gillet C; Barbier F; Simoneau-Buessinger E
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2016 Nov; 16(8):1121-9. PubMed ID: 27210455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Effects of Running Speed on Ground Reaction Forces and Lower Limb Kinematics During Single-Leg Stop Movement.
    Tominaga R; Ishii Y; Ueda T; Kurokawa T
    J Strength Cond Res; 2016 May; 30(5):1224-30. PubMed ID: 24149754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnitude and Spatial Distribution of Impact Intensity Under the Foot Relates to Initial Foot Contact Pattern.
    Breine B; Malcolm P; Segers V; Gerlo J; Derie R; Pataky T; Frederick EC; De Clercq D
    J Appl Biomech; 2017 Dec; 33(6):431-436. PubMed ID: 28657790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamically adjustable foot-ground contact model to estimate ground reaction force during walking and running.
    Jung Y; Jung M; Ryu J; Yoon S; Park SK; Koo S
    Gait Posture; 2016 Mar; 45():62-8. PubMed ID: 26979885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surface effects on ground reaction forces and lower extremity kinematics in running.
    Dixon SJ; Collop AC; Batt ME
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2000 Nov; 32(11):1919-26. PubMed ID: 11079523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical and physiological comparison of barefoot and two shod conditions in experienced barefoot runners.
    Squadrone R; Gallozzi C
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2009 Mar; 49(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 19188889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical analysis of the stance phase during barefoot and shod running.
    De Wit B; De Clercq D; Aerts P
    J Biomech; 2000 Mar; 33(3):269-78. PubMed ID: 10673110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of lower limb kinetics, kinematics and muscle activation during drop jumping under shod and barefoot conditions.
    Koyama K; Yamauchi J
    J Biomech; 2018 Mar; 69():47-53. PubMed ID: 29397998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rearfoot and midfoot or forefoot impacts in habitually shod runners.
    Boyer ER; Rooney BD; Derrick TR
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014 Jul; 46(7):1384-91. PubMed ID: 24300124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Movement characteristics of the tennis volley.
    Chow JW; Carlton LG; Chae WS; Shim JH; Lim YT; Kuenster AF
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1999 Jun; 31(6):855-63. PubMed ID: 10378913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical response to changes in natural turf during running and turning.
    Stiles VH; Guisasola IN; James IT; Dixon SJ
    J Appl Biomech; 2011 Feb; 27(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 21451183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual Responses to a Barefoot Running Program: Insight Into Risk of Injury.
    Tam N; Tucker R; Astephen Wilson JL
    Am J Sports Med; 2016 Mar; 44(3):777-84. PubMed ID: 26744483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.