These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16761977)

  • 1. Differences between sliding semi-landmark methods in geometric morphometrics, with an application to human craniofacial and dental variation.
    Perez SI; Bernal V; Gonzalez PN
    J Anat; 2006 Jun; 208(6):769-84. PubMed ID: 16761977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Technical note: Performance of semi and fully automated approaches for registration of 3D surface coordinates in geometric morphometric studies.
    Gonzalez PN; Barbeito-Andrés J; D'Addona LA; Bernal V; Perez SI
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2016 May; 160(1):169-78. PubMed ID: 26748891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Technical Note: Anatomic identification of isolated modern human molars: testing Procrustes aligned outlines as a standardization procedure for elliptic fourier analysis.
    Corny J; Détroit F
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2014 Feb; 153(2):314-22. PubMed ID: 24242977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sex determination by three-dimensional geometric morphometrics of craniofacial form.
    Chovalopoulou ME; Valakos ED; Manolis SK
    Anthropol Anz; 2016; 73(3):195-206. PubMed ID: 27490899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional Procrustes analysis of modern human craniofacial form.
    Badawi-Fayad J; Cabanis EA
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2007 Mar; 290(3):268-76. PubMed ID: 17525943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evolutionary relationships among prehistoric human populations: an evaluation of relatedness patterns based on facial morphometric data using molecular data.
    Perez SI; Bernal V; Gonzalez PN
    Hum Biol; 2007 Feb; 79(1):25-50. PubMed ID: 17985655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The promise of geometric morphometrics.
    Richtsmeier JT; DeLeon VB; Lele SR
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2002; Suppl 35():63-91. PubMed ID: 12653309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Principles and methods of geometric morphometrics].
    Pavlinov IIa; Mikeshina NG
    Zh Obshch Biol; 2002; 63(6):473-93. PubMed ID: 12510587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Molar size and shape in the estimation of biological ancestry: A comparison of relative cusp location using geometric morphometrics and interlandmark distances.
    Kenyhercz MW; Klales AR; Kenyhercz WE
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2014 Feb; 153(2):269-79. PubMed ID: 24248428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Geometric morphometrics of different malocclusions in lateral skull radiographs.
    Freudenthaler J; Čelar A; Ritt C; Mitteröcker P
    J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Jan; 78(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 27796401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Technical note: a novel geometric morphometric approach to the study of long bone shape variation.
    Frelat MA; Katina S; Weber GW; Bookstein FL
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2012 Dec; 149(4):628-38. PubMed ID: 23124572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Craniofacial growth, maturation, and change: teens to midadulthood.
    Ross AH; Williams SE
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 21(2):458-61. PubMed ID: 20489450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selecting subjects with high craniofacial shape homogeneity for clinical trials.
    Akli E; Marinaki L; Halazonetis DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Dec; 148(6):1026-35. PubMed ID: 26672709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Climate signatures in the morphological differentiation of worldwide modern human populations.
    Hubbe M; Hanihara T; Harvati K
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2009 Nov; 292(11):1720-33. PubMed ID: 19718714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lower molar shape and size in prosimian and platyrrhine primates.
    St Clair EM; Boyer DM
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2016 Oct; 161(2):237-58. PubMed ID: 27312120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Craniofacial evolution in Polynesia: a geometric morphometric study of population diversity.
    Buck T; Viđarsdóttir US
    Am J Hum Biol; 2012; 24(6):776-85. PubMed ID: 22987741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Consistency of selected craniometric landmark locations and the resulting variation in measurements.
    Smith AC; Boaks A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Nov; 280():156-163. PubMed ID: 29055251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ontogeny of robusticity of craniofacial traits in modern humans: a study of South American populations.
    Gonzalez PN; Perez SI; Bernal V
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2010 Jul; 142(3):367-79. PubMed ID: 20013868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Technical note: A new method for measuring long bone curvature using 3D landmarks and semi-landmarks.
    De Groote I; Lockwood CA; Aiello LC
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2010 Apr; 141(4):658-64. PubMed ID: 20091851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigating the sex-related geometric variation of the human cranium.
    Bertsatos A; Papageorgopoulou C; Valakos E; Chovalopoulou ME
    Int J Legal Med; 2018 Sep; 132(5):1505-1514. PubMed ID: 29380124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.