These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16762056)

  • 1. Gender differences in hemispheric asymmetry for face processing.
    Proverbio AM; Brignone V; Matarazzo S; Del Zotto M; Zani A
    BMC Neurosci; 2006 Jun; 7():44. PubMed ID: 16762056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sex differences in callosal transfer and hemispheric specialization for face coding.
    Proverbio AM; Mazzara R; Riva F; Manfredi M
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(9):2325-32. PubMed ID: 22727879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sex differences in face gender recognition: an event-related potential study.
    Sun Y; Gao X; Han S
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1327():69-76. PubMed ID: 20153301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Early and late temporo-spatial effects of contextual interference during perception of facial affect.
    Frühholz S; Fehr T; Herrmann M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Oct; 74(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 19470392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sex differences in the brain response to affective scenes with or without humans.
    Proverbio AM; Adorni R; Zani A; Trestianu L
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2374-88. PubMed ID: 19061906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early holistic face-like processing of Arcimboldo paintings in the right occipito-temporal cortex: evidence from the N170 ERP component.
    Caharel S; Leleu A; Bernard C; Viggiano MP; Lalonde R; Rebaï M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Nov; 90(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 23816562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Disentangling the interaction of sex differences and hemispheric specialization for face processing - Evidence from ERPs.
    Stasch J; Mohr B; Neuhaus AH
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Jul; 136():144-150. PubMed ID: 29908225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interplay between familiarity and orientation in face processing: an ERP study.
    Marzi T; Viggiano MP
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Sep; 65(3):182-92. PubMed ID: 17512996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gender and parental status affect the visual cortical response to infant facial expression.
    Proverbio AM; Brignone V; Matarazzo S; Del Zotto M; Zani A
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(14):2987-99. PubMed ID: 16879841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Priming with threatening faces modulates the self-face advantage by enhancing the other-face processing rather than suppressing the self-face processing.
    Guan L; Qi M; Li H; Hitchman G; Yang J; Liu Y
    Brain Res; 2015 May; 1608():97-107. PubMed ID: 25765156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Naso-temporal asymmetry of the N170 for processing faces in normal viewers but not in developmental prosopagnosia.
    de Gelder B; Stekelenburg JJ
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Mar; 376(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 15694271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lateralization for dynamic facial expressions in human superior temporal sulcus.
    De Winter FL; Zhu Q; Van den Stock J; Nelissen K; Peeters R; de Gelder B; Vanduffel W; Vandenbulcke M
    Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 106():340-52. PubMed ID: 25463458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neurophysiological evidence (ERPs) for hemispheric processing of facial expressions of emotions: Evidence from whole face and chimeric face stimuli.
    Damaskinou N; Watling D
    Laterality; 2018 May; 23(3):318-343. PubMed ID: 28857672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sex differences in face processing: Are women less lateralized and faster than men?
    Godard O; Fiori N
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):167-75. PubMed ID: 20621740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hemispheric asymmetries in image-specific and abstractive priming of famous faces: evidence from reaction times and event-related brain potentials.
    Cooper TJ; Harvey M; Lavidor M; Schweinberger SR
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Oct; 45(13):2910-21. PubMed ID: 17663008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Processing of unattended facial emotions: a visual mismatch negativity study.
    Stefanics G; Csukly G; Komlósi S; Czobor P; Czigler I
    Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(3):3042-9. PubMed ID: 22037000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modification of N170 by different emotional expression of schematic faces.
    Krombholz A; Schaefer F; Boucsein W
    Biol Psychol; 2007 Oct; 76(3):156-62. PubMed ID: 17764809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Aging effects on selective attention-related electroencephalographic patterns during face encoding.
    Deiber MP; Rodriguez C; Jaques D; Missonnier P; Emch J; Millet P; Gold G; Giannakopoulos P; Ibañez V
    Neuroscience; 2010 Nov; 171(1):173-86. PubMed ID: 20801196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual adaptation provides objective electrophysiological evidence of facial identity discrimination.
    Retter TL; Rossion B
    Cortex; 2016 Jul; 80():35-50. PubMed ID: 26875725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variable left-hemisphere language and orthographic lateralization reduces right-hemisphere face lateralization.
    Dundas EM; Plaut DC; Behrmann M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 May; 27(5):913-25. PubMed ID: 25390197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.