These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16762668)

  • 1. Applying the item response theory to classroom examinations.
    Lawson DM
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2006 Jun; 29(5):393-7. PubMed ID: 16762668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The presence and impact of local item dependence on objective structured clinical examinations scores and the potential use of the polytomous, many-facet Rasch model.
    Lawson DM; Brailovsky C
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2006 Oct; 29(8):651-7. PubMed ID: 17045099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence-based practice for equating health status items: sample size and IRT model.
    Cook KF; Taylor PW; Dodd BG; Teal CR; McHorney CA
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(2):175-89. PubMed ID: 17440260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationship between candidate communication ability and oral certification examination scores.
    Lunz ME; Bashook PG
    Med Educ; 2008 Dec; 42(12):1227-33. PubMed ID: 19120954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A primer on classical test theory and item response theory for assessments in medical education.
    De Champlain AF
    Med Educ; 2010 Jan; 44(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 20078762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of collaborative testing on student performance and satisfaction in a chiropractic science course.
    Meseke CA; Bovée ML; Gran DF
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2009 May; 32(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 19447268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictors of performance of students from the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College on the licensure examinations of the Canadian Chiropractic Examining Board.
    Lawson DM; Till H
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2006 Sep; 29(7):566-9. PubMed ID: 16949946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: the consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education.
    Downing SM
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2005; 10(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 16078098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Applying generalizability theory to high-stakes objective structured clinical examinations in a naturalistic environment.
    Lawson DM
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2006; 29(6):463-7. PubMed ID: 16904492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are faculty predictions or item taxonomies useful for estimating the outcome of multiple-choice examinations?
    Kibble JD; Johnson T
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2011 Dec; 35(4):396-401. PubMed ID: 22139777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Post-examination interpretation of objective test data: monitoring and improving the quality of high-stakes examinations: AMEE Guide No. 66.
    Tavakol M; Dennick R
    Med Teach; 2012; 34(3):e161-75. PubMed ID: 22364473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Item response theory and the measurement of motor behavior.
    Safrit MJ; Cohen AS; Costa MG
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 1989 Dec; 60(4):325-35. PubMed ID: 2489859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity of multiple-choice examinations in surgery.
    Stillman RM
    Surgery; 1984 Jul; 96(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 6740501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of item pool restriction on the precision of ability measurement for a Rasch-based CAT: comparisons to traditional fixed length examinations.
    Halkitis PN
    J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(2):97-122. PubMed ID: 9661734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Meta-evaluation in clinical anatomy: a practical application of item response theory in multiple choice examinations.
    Severo M; Tavares MA
    Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 19924785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Facilitating the learning process: a pilot study of collaborative testing vs individualistic testing in the chiropractic college setting.
    Meseke JK; Nafziger R; Meseke CA
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2008 May; 31(4):308-12. PubMed ID: 18486752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Item response theory test equating in health sciences education.
    Guilera G; Gómez J
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Mar; 13(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 16847729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of the NHANES ADL scale in a sample of patients with report of cervical pain: factor analysis, item response theory analysis, and line item validity.
    Cook CE; Richardson JK; Pietrobon R; Braga L; Silva HM; Turner D
    Disabil Rehabil; 2006 Aug; 28(15):929-35. PubMed ID: 16861200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of knowledge of primary care activities in a sample of medical and chiropractic students.
    Sandefur R; Febbo TA; Rupert RL
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2005 Jun; 28(5):336-44. PubMed ID: 15965408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patient-centered interviewing and student performance in a comprehensive clinical skills examination: is there an association?
    Rouf E; Chumley H; Dobbie A
    Patient Educ Couns; 2009 Apr; 75(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 19013743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.