These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16762668)

  • 21. Undesired variance due to examiner stringency/leniency effect in communication skill scores assessed in OSCEs.
    Harasym PH; Woloschuk W; Cunning L
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Dec; 13(5):617-32. PubMed ID: 17610034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Student course performance and collaborative testing: a prospective follow-on study.
    Meseke CA; Nafziger RE; Meseke JK
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2008 Oct; 31(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 18984244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Applying multilevel item response theory to vision-related quality of life in Dutch visually impaired elderly.
    van Nispen RM; Knol DL; Langelaan M; de Boer MR; Terwee CB; van Rens GH
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Aug; 84(8):710-20. PubMed ID: 17700335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of proficiency in an anesthesiology course across distinct medical student cohorts: psychometric approaches to test equating.
    Liao SW; Chang KY; Ting CK; Tsou MY; Chen ET; Chan KH; Chang WK
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2014 Mar; 77(3):150-4. PubMed ID: 24290232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Practical issues in the application of item response theory: a demonstration using items from the pediatric quality of life inventory (PedsQL) 4.0 generic core scales.
    Hill CD; Edwards MC; Thissen D; Langer MM; Wirth RJ; Burwinkle TM; Varni JW
    Med Care; 2007 May; 45(5 Suppl 1):S39-47. PubMed ID: 17443118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Is an Angoff standard an indication of minimal competence of examinees or of judges?
    Verheggen MM; Muijtjens AM; Van Os J; Schuwirth LW
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 May; 13(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 17043915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Some links between classical and modern test theory via the two-level hierarchical generalized linear model.
    Miyazaki Y
    J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(3):289-310. PubMed ID: 15942072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Using classical and modern measurement theories to explore rater, domain, and gender influences on student writing ability.
    Gyagenda IS; Engelhard G
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(3):225-46. PubMed ID: 19671987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Validating a multiple mini-interview question bank assessing entry-level reasoning skills in candidates for graduate-entry medicine and dentistry programmes.
    Roberts C; Zoanetti N; Rothnie I
    Med Educ; 2009 Apr; 43(4):350-9. PubMed ID: 19335577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An empirical study on the relationship between teacher's judgments and fit statistics of the partial credit model.
    Baek SG; Kim HS
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 19299887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Item response theory analyses of physical functioning items in the medical outcomes study.
    Hays RD; Liu H; Spritzer K; Cella D
    Med Care; 2007 May; 45(5 Suppl 1):S32-8. PubMed ID: 17443117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Using the Rasch model in nursing research: an introduction and illustrative example.
    Hagquist C; Bruce M; Gustavsson JP
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Mar; 46(3):380-93. PubMed ID: 19059593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Psychometric evaluation of a knowledge based examination using Rasch analysis: an illustrative guide: AMEE guide no. 72.
    Tavakol M; Dennick R
    Med Teach; 2013; 35(1):e838-48. PubMed ID: 23137252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparability of decisions for computer adaptive and written examinations.
    Lunz ME; Bergstrom BA
    J Allied Health; 1991; 20(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 2045351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impact of item-writing flaws in multiple-choice questions on student achievement in high-stakes nursing assessments.
    Tarrant M; Ware J
    Med Educ; 2008 Feb; 42(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 18230093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Efficiency analysis of two written short-answer student evaluation formats.
    Stratford PW
    Phys Ther; 1988 Oct; 68(10):1546-9. PubMed ID: 3174836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The promise and challenge of including multimedia items in medical licensure examinations: some insights from an empirical trial.
    Shen L; Li F; Wattleworth R; Filipetto F
    Acad Med; 2010 Oct; 85(10 Suppl):S56-9. PubMed ID: 20881705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quality assurance of item writing: during the introduction of multiple choice questions in medicine for high stakes examinations.
    Ware J; Vik T
    Med Teach; 2009 Mar; 31(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 18825568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of a preliminary physical function item bank supported the expected advantages of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).
    Rose M; Bjorner JB; Becker J; Fries JF; Ware JE
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 61(1):17-33. PubMed ID: 18083459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluating asthma control: a comparison of measures using an item response theory approach.
    Ahmed S; Ernst P; Tamblyn R; Colman N
    J Asthma; 2007 Sep; 44(7):547-54. PubMed ID: 17885858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.