These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16763270)

  • 1. NICE work: nice try.
    Shuster S
    BMJ; 2006 Jun; 332(7554):1394. PubMed ID: 16763270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How NICE may be outflanked.
    Ferner RE; McDowell SE
    BMJ; 2006 May; 332(7552):1268-71. PubMed ID: 16735342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. From rationing to rational: the evolving status of NICE.
    Minhas R; Patel KC
    J R Soc Med; 2008 Sep; 101(9):436-42. PubMed ID: 18779244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lansley is right: age trumps poverty.
    Asthana S
    Health Serv J; 2012 May; 122(6306):16-7. PubMed ID: 22741385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lessons for U.S. managed care from the British National Health Service, II: Setting priorities.
    Sabin JE; Daniels N
    Psychiatr Serv; 1997 Apr; 48(4):469-70, 482. PubMed ID: 9090729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Review of NICE's recommendations, 1999-2005.
    Raftery J
    BMJ; 2006 May; 332(7552):1266-8. PubMed ID: 16735341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A nice try.
    Munro R
    Nurs Times; 1999 Aug 18-24; 95(33):14-5. PubMed ID: 10614400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MISG-uided money.
    Hudson B
    Health Serv J; 1992 Jul; 102(5310):26-7. PubMed ID: 10120475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Setting priorities in the new NHS: can purchasers use cost-utility information?
    Gerard K
    Health Policy; 1993 Sep; 25(1-2):109-25. PubMed ID: 10129152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Moving forward on rationing: an economic view.
    Donaldson C; Bate A; Brambleby P; Waldner H
    BMJ; 2008 Oct; 337():a1872. PubMed ID: 18845596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Taking equity seriously: a dilemma for government from allocating resources to primary care groups.
    Bevan G
    BMJ; 1998 Jan; 316(7124):39-42; discussion 43. PubMed ID: 9451266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. NICE, the draft fertility guideline and dodging the big question.
    McMillan JR
    J Med Ethics; 2003 Dec; 29(6):313-4. PubMed ID: 14662807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can NICE be nicer? In a world of budget constraints there are no easy solutions.
    Drummond M; Sorenson C
    Value Health; 2009; 12(5):634-6. PubMed ID: 19402855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rationing in the fiscal ice age.
    Klein R
    Health Econ Policy Law; 2010 Oct; 5(4):389-96. PubMed ID: 20565993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dilemmas and decisions.
    Klein R
    Health Manage Q; 1992; 14(2):2-5. PubMed ID: 10119355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. From global rationing to target setting in the U.K.
    Klein R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; SPEC Suppl():3-4. PubMed ID: 2745056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Where are we in the rationing debate?
    Goold SD; Baum NM
    BMJ; 2008 Oct; 337():a2047. PubMed ID: 18849309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Playing safe on funding.
    O'Byrne J
    Nurs Stand; 1991 Jan 9-15; 5(15):23. PubMed ID: 1898855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New drugs for old: disinvestment and NICE.
    Hughes DA; Ferner RE
    BMJ; 2010 Feb; 340():c572. PubMed ID: 20185495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Public health and economics in tandem: programme budgeting, marginal analysis and priority setting in practice.
    Madden L; Hussey R; Mooney G; Church E
    Health Policy; 1995 Aug; 33(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 10144439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.