BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16763270)

  • 1. NICE work: nice try.
    Shuster S
    BMJ; 2006 Jun; 332(7554):1394. PubMed ID: 16763270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How NICE may be outflanked.
    Ferner RE; McDowell SE
    BMJ; 2006 May; 332(7552):1268-71. PubMed ID: 16735342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. From rationing to rational: the evolving status of NICE.
    Minhas R; Patel KC
    J R Soc Med; 2008 Sep; 101(9):436-42. PubMed ID: 18779244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lansley is right: age trumps poverty.
    Asthana S
    Health Serv J; 2012 May; 122(6306):16-7. PubMed ID: 22741385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lessons for U.S. managed care from the British National Health Service, II: Setting priorities.
    Sabin JE; Daniels N
    Psychiatr Serv; 1997 Apr; 48(4):469-70, 482. PubMed ID: 9090729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Review of NICE's recommendations, 1999-2005.
    Raftery J
    BMJ; 2006 May; 332(7552):1266-8. PubMed ID: 16735341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A nice try.
    Munro R
    Nurs Times; 1999 Aug 18-24; 95(33):14-5. PubMed ID: 10614400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MISG-uided money.
    Hudson B
    Health Serv J; 1992 Jul; 102(5310):26-7. PubMed ID: 10120475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Setting priorities in the new NHS: can purchasers use cost-utility information?
    Gerard K
    Health Policy; 1993 Sep; 25(1-2):109-25. PubMed ID: 10129152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Moving forward on rationing: an economic view.
    Donaldson C; Bate A; Brambleby P; Waldner H
    BMJ; 2008 Oct; 337():a1872. PubMed ID: 18845596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Taking equity seriously: a dilemma for government from allocating resources to primary care groups.
    Bevan G
    BMJ; 1998 Jan; 316(7124):39-42; discussion 43. PubMed ID: 9451266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. NICE, the draft fertility guideline and dodging the big question.
    McMillan JR
    J Med Ethics; 2003 Dec; 29(6):313-4. PubMed ID: 14662807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can NICE be nicer? In a world of budget constraints there are no easy solutions.
    Drummond M; Sorenson C
    Value Health; 2009; 12(5):634-6. PubMed ID: 19402855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rationing in the fiscal ice age.
    Klein R
    Health Econ Policy Law; 2010 Oct; 5(4):389-96. PubMed ID: 20565993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dilemmas and decisions.
    Klein R
    Health Manage Q; 1992; 14(2):2-5. PubMed ID: 10119355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. From global rationing to target setting in the U.K.
    Klein R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; SPEC Suppl():3-4. PubMed ID: 2745056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Where are we in the rationing debate?
    Goold SD; Baum NM
    BMJ; 2008 Oct; 337():a2047. PubMed ID: 18849309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Playing safe on funding.
    O'Byrne J
    Nurs Stand; 1991 Jan 9-15; 5(15):23. PubMed ID: 1898855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New drugs for old: disinvestment and NICE.
    Hughes DA; Ferner RE
    BMJ; 2010 Feb; 340():c572. PubMed ID: 20185495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Public health and economics in tandem: programme budgeting, marginal analysis and priority setting in practice.
    Madden L; Hussey R; Mooney G; Church E
    Health Policy; 1995 Aug; 33(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 10144439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.