These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16764849)

  • 21. Domain generality and specificity in children's causal inference about ambiguous data.
    Sobel DM; Munro SE
    Dev Psychol; 2009 Mar; 45(2):511-24. PubMed ID: 19271835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bayesian generic priors for causal learning.
    Lu H; Yuille AL; Liljeholm M; Cheng PW; Holyoak KJ
    Psychol Rev; 2008 Oct; 115(4):955-84. PubMed ID: 18954210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Violations of coherence in subjective probability: a representational and assessment processes account.
    Mandel DR
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):130-56. PubMed ID: 17300773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Can being scared cause tummy aches? Naive theories, ambiguous evidence, and preschoolers' causal inferences.
    Schulz LE; Bonawitz EB; Griffiths TL
    Dev Psychol; 2007 Sep; 43(5):1124-39. PubMed ID: 17723040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Integration of base rates and new information in an abstract hypothesis-testing task.
    Rusconi P; Marelli M; Russo S; D'Addario M; Cherubini P
    Br J Psychol; 2013 May; 104(2):193-211. PubMed ID: 23560666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The psychophysics of contingency assessment.
    Allan LG; Hannah SD; Crump MJ; Siegel S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 May; 137(2):226-43. PubMed ID: 18473655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Background beliefs in Bayesian inference.
    Evans JS; Handley SJ; Over DE; Perham N
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Mar; 30(2):179-90. PubMed ID: 12035880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accounting for occurrences: a new view of the use of contingency information in causal judgment.
    White PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):204-18. PubMed ID: 18194063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Inequality constrained analysis of variance: a Bayesian approach.
    Klugkist I; Laudy O; Hoijtink H
    Psychol Methods; 2005 Dec; 10(4):477-93. PubMed ID: 16393001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bayesian rationality in evaluating multiple testimonies: incorporating the role of coherence.
    Harris AJ; Hahn U
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1366-73. PubMed ID: 19686030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cognitive and emotional processing in high novelty seeking associated with the L-DRD4 genotype.
    Roussos P; Giakoumaki SG; Bitsios P
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jun; 47(7):1654-9. PubMed ID: 19397860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Identifying expectations about the strength of causal relationships.
    Yeung S; Griffiths TL
    Cogn Psychol; 2015 Feb; 76():1-29. PubMed ID: 25522277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Robust Bayesian clustering.
    Archambeau C; Verleysen M
    Neural Netw; 2007 Jan; 20(1):129-38. PubMed ID: 17011164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. On the determinants of the conjunction fallacy: probability versus inductive confirmation.
    Tentori K; Crupi V; Russo S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Feb; 142(1):235-255. PubMed ID: 22823498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Issues in the application of Bayes' Theorem to child abuse decision making.
    Proeve M
    Child Maltreat; 2009 Feb; 14(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 18495947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Source reliability and the conjunction fallacy.
    Jarvstad A; Hahn U
    Cogn Sci; 2011; 35(4):682-711. PubMed ID: 21564268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. When does information about causal structure improve statistical reasoning?
    McNair S; Feeney A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):625-45. PubMed ID: 23931633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Selection of human embryos for transfer by Bayesian classifiers.
    Morales DA; Bengoetxea E; Larrañaga P
    Comput Biol Med; 2008; 38(11-12):1177-86. PubMed ID: 18951123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Automatic and controlled components of judgment and decision making.
    Ferreira MB; Garcia-Marques L; Sherman SJ; Sherman JW
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Nov; 91(5):797-813. PubMed ID: 17059302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Controlling for causally relevant third variables.
    Goodie AS; Williams CC; Crooks CL
    J Gen Psychol; 2003 Oct; 130(4):415-30. PubMed ID: 14672103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.