572 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16765157)
1. Ceramic implant abutments: cutting efficiency and resultant surface finish by diamond rotary cutting instruments.
Park SW; Driscoll CF; Romberg EE; Siegel S; Thompson G
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):444-9. PubMed ID: 16765157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of cutting efficiencies between electric and air-turbine dental handpieces.
Choi C; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Feb; 103(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 20141814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Heat transfer to the implant-bone interface during preparation of a zirconia/alumina abutment.
Huh JB; Eckert SE; Ko SM; Choi YG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):679-83. PubMed ID: 19885408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments.
Aramouni P; Zebouni E; Tashkandi E; Dib S; Salameh Z; Almas K
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):41-8. PubMed ID: 18997915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measurement of the rotational misfit and implant-abutment gap of all-ceramic abutments.
Garine WN; Funkenbusch PD; Ercoli C; Wodenscheck J; Murphy WC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):928-38. PubMed ID: 18271374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of different surface treatments on the short-term bond strength and durability between a zirconia post and a composite resin core material.
Akgungor G; Sen D; Aydin M
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 May; 99(5):388-99. PubMed ID: 18456050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Changes in the cutting efficiency of different types of dental diamond rotary instrument with repeated cuts and disinfection.
Bae JH; Yi J; Kim S; Shim JS; Lee KW
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jan; 111(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 24231434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The implant-abutment interface of alumina and zirconia abutments.
Yüzügüllü B; Avci M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 May; 10(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 18218054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of surface-finishing protocols on the roughness, color change, and translucency of different ceramic systems.
Akar GC; Pekkan G; Çal E; Eskitaşçıoğlu G; Özcan M
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):314-21. PubMed ID: 24513427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An in vitro evaluation of ZiReal abutments with hexagonal connection: in original state and following abutment preparation.
Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(1):108-14. PubMed ID: 15747681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of bur abrasive particle size and abutment composition on preparation of ceramic implant abutments.
Blue DS; Griggs JA; Woody RD; Miller BH
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Sep; 90(3):247-54. PubMed ID: 12942058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of hydrofluoric acid surface treatment and bond strength of a zirconia veneering ceramic.
Chaiyabutr Y; McGowan S; Phillips KM; Kois JC; Giordano RA
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):194-202. PubMed ID: 18762031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro comparison of the cutting efficiency and temperature production of ten different rotary cutting instruments. Part II: electric handpiece and comparison with turbine.
Ercoli C; Rotella M; Funkenbusch PD; Russell S; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):319-31. PubMed ID: 19410066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An in vitro evaluation of titanium, zirconia, and alumina procera abutments with hexagonal connection.
Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):575-80. PubMed ID: 16955608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutments with CAD/CAM commercially fabricated zirconia implant abutments.
Kim S; Kim HI; Brewer JD; Monaco EA
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 19328275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.
Kim JS; Raigrodski AJ; Flinn BD; Rubenstein JE; Chung KH; Mancl LA
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An evaluation of the effects of handpiece speed, abrasive characteristics, and polishing load on the flexural strength of polished ceramics.
Ahmad R; Morgano SM; Wu BM; Giordano RA
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Nov; 94(5):421-9. PubMed ID: 16275301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
