These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

2309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16765158)

  • 21. Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns.
    Tan KM; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Limkangwalmongkol P; Romberg E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22304741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of 7 luting protocols and their effect on the retention and marginal leakage of a cement-retained dental implant restoration.
    Pan YH; Ramp LC; Lin CK; Liu PR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):587-92. PubMed ID: 16955610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of surface treatment on the retention of implant-supported zirconia restorations over short abutments.
    Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Jabbari E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 24388717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Retentiveness of dental cements used with metallic implant components.
    Squier RS; Agar JR; Duncan JP; Taylor TD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(6):793-8. PubMed ID: 11769829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Retention and leakage of implant-supported restorations luted with provisional cement: a pilot study.
    Pan YH; Ramp LC; Lin CK; Liu PR
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Mar; 34(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 17302949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Retention and marginal leakage of provisional crowns cemented with provisional cements enriched with chlorhexidine diacetate.
    Lewinstein I; Chweidan H; Matalon S; Pilo R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Nov; 98(5):373-8. PubMed ID: 18021826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass-fiber endodontic posts.
    Balbosh A; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):218-23. PubMed ID: 16543019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cementable implant crowns composed of cast superstructure frameworks luted to electroformed primary copings: an in vitro retention study.
    Di Felice R; Rappelli G; Camaioni E; Cattani M; Meyer JM; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 17224031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of surface topography of implant abutments on retention of cemented single-tooth crowns.
    de Campos TN; Adachi LK; Miashiro K; Yoshida H; Shinkai RS; Neto PT; Frigerio ML
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2010 Aug; 30(4):409-13. PubMed ID: 20664843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents.
    Menani LR; Ribeiro RF; Antunes RP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18262015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Retention of zirconia ceramic copings bonded to titanium abutments.
    Ebert A; Hedderich J; Kern M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):921-7. PubMed ID: 18271373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of a cementing technique in addition to luting agent on the uniaxial retention force of a single-tooth implant-supported restoration: an in vitro study.
    Santosa RE; Martin W; Morton D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1145-52. PubMed ID: 21197491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Ceramic implant abutments: cutting efficiency and resultant surface finish by diamond rotary cutting instruments.
    Park SW; Driscoll CF; Romberg EE; Siegel S; Thompson G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):444-9. PubMed ID: 16765157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fracture resistance of single-tooth implant-supported all-ceramic restorations: an in vitro study.
    Att W; Kurun S; Gerds T; Strub JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 16473084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of superstructure materials on strain around an implant under 2 loading conditions: a technical investigation.
    Stegaroiu R; Khraisat A; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):735-42. PubMed ID: 15508991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of the amount of excess cement around the margins of cement-retained dental implant restorations: the effect of the cement application method.
    Chee WW; Duncan J; Afshar M; Moshaverinia A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 23566601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Retention, marginal leakage, and cement solubility of provisional crowns cemented with temporary cement containing stannous fluoride.
    Lewinstein I; Fuhrer N; Gelfand K; Cardash H; Pilo R
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 12737253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of airborne-particle abrasion on mechanical properties and bond strength of carbon/epoxy and glass/bis-GMA fiber-reinforced resin posts.
    Soares CJ; Santana FR; Pereira JC; Araujo TS; Menezes MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 99(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 18514666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fracture strength and failure mode of maxillary implant-supported provisional single crowns: a comparison of composite resin crowns fabricated directly over PEEK abutments and solid titanium abutments.
    Santing HJ; Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Özcan M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Dec; 14(6):882-9. PubMed ID: 21176099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Crown retention and flexural strength of eight provisional cements.
    Lawson NC; Burgess JO; Mercante D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Dec; 98(6):455-60. PubMed ID: 18061739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 116.