183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16765187)
1. Testicular blood flow measurements and mean resistive index values after microsurgical and high ligation varicocelectomy.
Tanriverdi O; Miroglu C; Horasanli K; Altay B; Caliskan KC; Gumus E
Urology; 2006 Jun; 67(6):1262-5. PubMed ID: 16765187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy with and without testicular delivery.
Ramasamy R; Schlegel PN
Urology; 2006 Dec; 68(6):1323-6. PubMed ID: 17169654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term effect of microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy on testicular blood flow.
Tarhan S; Ucer O; Sahin MO; Gumus B
J Androl; 2011; 32(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 20671143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The systematic use of intraoperative vascular Doppler ultrasound during microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy improves precise identification and preservation of testicular blood supply.
Cocuzza M; Pagani R; Coelho R; Srougi M; Hallak J
Fertil Steril; 2010 May; 93(7):2396-9. PubMed ID: 19268931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Incidence and postoperative outcomes of accidental ligation of the testicular artery during microsurgical varicocelectomy.
Chan PT; Wright EJ; Goldstein M
J Urol; 2005 Feb; 173(2):482-4. PubMed ID: 15643221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Spermatic vein and artery ligation for varicocele].
Chen GQ; Jiang DF; Chen C; Tang XQ; Liu XB; Bai WJ
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2010 Feb; 16(2):154-7. PubMed ID: 20369701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Varicocelectomy for male infertility: a comparative study of open, laparoscopic and microsurgical approaches.
Al-Said S; Al-Naimi A; Al-Ansari A; Younis N; Shamsodini A; A-sadiq K; Shokeir AA
J Urol; 2008 Jul; 180(1):266-70. PubMed ID: 18499176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microsurgical repair of the adolescent varicocele.
Lemack GE; Uzzo RG; Schlegel PN; Goldstein M
J Urol; 1998 Jul; 160(1):179-81. PubMed ID: 9628646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Subinguinal microvaricocelectomy versus retroperitoneal varicocelectomy: comparative study of complications and surgical outcome.
Ghanem H; Anis T; El-Nashar A; Shamloul R
Urology; 2004 Nov; 64(5):1005-9. PubMed ID: 15533495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is microsurgery necessary in grade 3 varicocele?
Kalkan M; Yalcinkaya S; Etlik O; Sahin C
Urol J; 2011; 8(4):298-301. PubMed ID: 22090049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of color Doppler ultrasound in prediction of the outcome of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy.
Hussein AF
J Urol; 2006 Nov; 176(5):2141-5. PubMed ID: 17070279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimizing the outcome of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy using isosulfan blue: a prospective randomized trial.
Schwentner C; Oswald J; Lunacek A; Deibl M; Bartsch G; Radmayr C
J Urol; 2006 Mar; 175(3 Pt 1):1049-52. PubMed ID: 16469616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adolescent varicocele repair: long-term results and comparison of surgical techniques according to optical magnification use in 100 cases at a single university hospital.
Cayan S; Acar D; Ulger S; Akbay E
J Urol; 2005 Nov; 174(5):2003-6; discussion 2006-7. PubMed ID: 16217378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Varicocelectomy by means of subinguinal cremasteric compartment disruption and venous ligation.
Shah P
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2007; 41(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 17366103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Testicular growth after successful varicocele correction in adolescents: comparison of artery sparing techniques with the Palomo procedure.
Atassi O; Kass EJ; Steinert BW
J Urol; 1995 Feb; 153(2):482-3. PubMed ID: 7815628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of low ligation and high ligation procedures of varicocele.
Khan M; Khan S; Pervez A; Nawaz H; Ahmed S; Tareen S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2003 May; 13(5):280-3. PubMed ID: 12757679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy of varicocelectomy in improving semen parameters: new meta-analytical approach.
Agarwal A; Deepinder F; Cocuzza M; Agarwal R; Short RA; Sabanegh E; Marmar JL
Urology; 2007 Sep; 70(3):532-8. PubMed ID: 17905111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Technical modification of microsurgical varicocelectomy can reduce operating time.
Zini A; Fischer A; Bellack D; Noss M; Kamal K; Chow V; Mak V
Urology; 2006 Apr; 67(4):803-6. PubMed ID: 16566968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoendoscopic single site varicocele ligation: comparison of testicular artery and lymphatic preservation versus complete testicular vessel ligation.
Kang DH; Lee JY; Chung JH; Jo JK; Lee SH; Ham WS; Cho KS; Lee KS; Kim TH; Lee SW
J Urol; 2013 Jan; 189(1):243-9. PubMed ID: 23174253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of outcomes of different varicocelectomy techniques: open inguinal, laparoscopic, and subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy: a randomized clinical trial.
Al-Kandari AM; Shabaan H; Ibrahim HM; Elshebiny YH; Shokeir AA
Urology; 2007 Mar; 69(3):417-20. PubMed ID: 17382134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
