70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16765267)
1. A meta-analysis demonstrates no significant differences between patient and population preferences.
Dolders MG; Zeegers MP; Groot W; Ament A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Jul; 59(7):653-64. PubMed ID: 16765267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measuring health state preferences for hemophilia: development of a disease-specific utility instrument.
Wasserman J; Aday LA; Begley CE; Ahn C; Lairson DR
Haemophilia; 2005 Jan; 11(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 15660989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measuring health preferences for Health Utilities Index Mark 3 health states: a study of feasibility and preference differences among ethnic groups in Singapore.
Luo N; Wang Q; Feeny D; Chen G; Li SC; Thumboo J
Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 17237454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient preferences between surgical and medical treatment in Crohn's disease.
Byrne CM; Solomon MJ; Young JM; Selby W; Harrison JD
Dis Colon Rectum; 2007 May; 50(5):586-97. PubMed ID: 17380368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of the scale upper anchor on health state preferences.
King JT; Tsevat J; Roberts MS
Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(2):257-66. PubMed ID: 19047763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient preferences for depression treatment programs and willingness to pay for treatment.
Morey E; Thacher JA; Craighead WE
J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2007 Jun; 10(2):73-85. PubMed ID: 17603148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Veterans' decision-making preferences and perceived involvement in care for chronic heart failure.
Rodriguez KL; Appelt CJ; Switzer GE; Sonel AF; Arnold RM
Heart Lung; 2008; 37(6):440-8. PubMed ID: 18992627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Positive psychological well-being and mortality: a quantitative review of prospective observational studies.
Chida Y; Steptoe A
Psychosom Med; 2008 Sep; 70(7):741-56. PubMed ID: 18725425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Elicitation of informed general population health state utility values: a review of the literature.
McTaggart-Cowan H
Value Health; 2011 Dec; 14(8):1153-7. PubMed ID: 22152187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A community-based study of acne-related health preferences in adolescents.
Chen CL; Kuppermann M; Caughey AB; Zane LT
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Aug; 144(8):988-94. PubMed ID: 18711070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preferences for current health and their association with outcomes in patients with kidney disease.
Plantinga LC; Fink NE; Bass EB; Boulware LE; Meyer KB; Powe NR
Med Care; 2007 Mar; 45(3):230-7. PubMed ID: 17304080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An urban community's preferences for hypothetical outcomes of analgesic pain treatment.
Palos GR; Cantor SB; Aday LA; Mendoza TR; Mobley GM; Cleeland CS
J Pain Symptom Manage; 2006 Nov; 32(5):470-7. PubMed ID: 17085273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Socioeconomic differences in preferences and willingness-to-pay for insulin delivery systems in type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
Guimarães C; Marra CA; Colley L; Gill S; Simpson S; Meneilly G; Queiroz RH; Lynd LD
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2009 Sep; 11(9):567-73. PubMed ID: 19764835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Community or patient preferences for cost-effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation: does it matter?
Oldridge N; Furlong W; Perkins A; Feeny D; Torrance GW
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 15(5):608-15. PubMed ID: 18800005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient preferences for characteristics differentiating ovarian stimulation treatments.
Landfeldt E; Jablonowska B; Norlander E; Persdotter-Eberg K; Thurin-Kjellberg A; Wramsby M; Ström O
Hum Reprod; 2012 Mar; 27(3):760-9. PubMed ID: 22240210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Importance of gender, socioeconomic status, and history of abuse on patient preference for endoscopist.
Schneider A; Kanagarajan N; Anjelly D; Reynolds JC; Ahmad A
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Feb; 104(2):340-8. PubMed ID: 19174794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Eliciting Canadian population preferences for health states using the Classification and Measurement System of Functional Health (CLAMES).
McIntosh CN; Connor Gorber S; Bernier J; Berthelot JM
Chronic Dis Can; 2007; 28(1-2):29-41. PubMed ID: 17953796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing the results of applying different methods of eliciting time preferences for health.
Gyrd-Hansen D
Eur J Health Econ; 2002; 3(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 15609113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of age, race and gender on preference scores for hypothetical health states.
Wittenberg E; Halpern E; Divi N; Prosser LA; Araki SS; Weeks JC
Qual Life Res; 2006 May; 15(4):645-53. PubMed ID: 16688497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Oaths and hypothetical bias.
Stevens TH; Tabatabaei M; Lass D
J Environ Manage; 2013 Sep; 127():135-41. PubMed ID: 23685274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
