70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16765267)
21. Corrigendum: Comparing the Effects of Hypothetical Moral Preferences on Real-Life and Hypothetical Behavior: Commentary on Bostyn, Sevenhant, and Roets (2018).
Psychol Sci; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1410. PubMed ID: 31415226
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [State of health of the population of the Celje region].
PLANINSEK F
Zdrav Vestn; 1955; 24(3):106-11. PubMed ID: 14397504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Inclusion and Consideration of Patient Preferences in Amnog Early Benefit Assessments.
Obradovic M; Rauland M
Value Health; 2014 Nov; 17(7):A440. PubMed ID: 27201180
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Hypothetical long-range interactions and restrictions on their parameters from force measurements.
Mostepanenko VM; Sokolov IY
Phys Rev D Part Fields; 1993 Apr; 47(7):2882-2891. PubMed ID: 10015893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. A Hypothetical Approach on Gender Differences in Cancer Diagnosis.
Sak K
J Transl Int Med; 2019 Sep; 7(3):90-92. PubMed ID: 31637178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Hypothetical Assessments of Trial Emulations-Reply.
Janda GS; Wallach JD; Ross JS
JAMA Intern Med; 2024 Apr; 184(4):446-447. PubMed ID: 38345787
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Hypothetical Assessments of Trial Emulations.
Schneeweiss S; Wang SV
JAMA Intern Med; 2024 Apr; 184(4):446. PubMed ID: 38345785
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. CLINICAL STUDY: The Patient Population.
Acta Neurol Scand; 1967 May; 43(S30):24-54. PubMed ID: 28612987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Developing an Australian utility value set for the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale-4D (ECOHIS-4D) using a discrete choice experiment.
Hettiarachchi RM; Arrow P; Senanayake S; Carter H; Brain D; Norman R; Tonmukayawul U; Jamieson L; Kularatna S
Eur J Health Econ; 2023 Nov; 24(8):1285-1296. PubMed ID: 36394684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Public versus patient health preferences: protocol for a study to elicit EQ-5D-5L health state valuations for patients who have survived a stay in intensive care.
Halling CMB; Gudex C; Perner A; Jensen CE; Gyrd-Hansen D
BMJ Open; 2022 May; 12(5):e058500. PubMed ID: 35613809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Determinants of Health Preferences Using Data from the Egyptian EQ-5D-5L Valuation Study.
Al Shabasy S; Al Sayah F; Abbassi M; Farid S
Patient; 2022 Sep; 15(5):589-598. PubMed ID: 35156181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. What's important when caring for a loved one? Population-based preference weights for the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for informal carers (ASCOT-Carer) for Austria.
Trukeschitz B; Hajji A; Batchelder L; Saloniki E; Linnosmaa I; Malley J
Qual Life Res; 2021 Jul; 30(7):1975-1984. PubMed ID: 33598854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Relative importance of the EQ-5D five dimensions among patients with chronic diseases in South Korea - a comparison with the general population preference weights.
Hong J
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2018 Aug; 16(1):159. PubMed ID: 30075726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Estimation of a Preference-Based Summary Score for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System: The PROMIS
Dewitt B; Feeny D; Fischhoff B; Cella D; Hays RD; Hess R; Pilkonis PA; Revicki DA; Roberts MS; Tsevat J; Yu L; Hanmer J
Med Decis Making; 2018 Aug; 38(6):683-698. PubMed ID: 29944456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of health state values derived from patients and individuals from the general population.
Gandhi M; Tan RS; Ng R; Choo SP; Chia WK; Toh CK; Lam C; Lee PT; Latt NKZ; Rand-Hendriksen K; Cheung YB; Luo N
Qual Life Res; 2017 Dec; 26(12):3353-3363. PubMed ID: 28808840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Patient versus general population health state valuations: a case study of non-specific low back pain.
van Dongen JM; van denBerg B; Bekkering GE; van Tulder MW; Ostelo RWJG
Qual Life Res; 2017 Jun; 26(6):1627-1633. PubMed ID: 28155048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cross-cultural variation in preference for replantation or revision amputation: Societal and surgeon views.
Maroukis BL; Shauver MJ; Nishizuka T; Hirata H; Chung KC
Injury; 2016 Apr; 47(4):818-23. PubMed ID: 26961436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Determinants of time trade-off valuations for EQ-5D-5L health states: data from the Canadian EQ-5D-5L valuation study.
Sayah FA; Bansback N; Bryan S; Ohinmaa A; Poissant L; Pullenayegum E; Xie F; Johnson JA
Qual Life Res; 2016 Jul; 25(7):1679-85. PubMed ID: 26659899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Do individuals with and without depression value depression differently? And if so, why?
Papageorgiou K; Vermeulen KM; Schroevers MJ; Stiggelbout AM; Buskens E; Krabbe PF; van den Heuvel E; Ranchor AV
Qual Life Res; 2015 Nov; 24(11):2565-75. PubMed ID: 26038219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Review of disability weight studies: comparison of methodological choices and values.
Haagsma JA; Polinder S; Cassini A; Colzani E; Havelaar AH
Popul Health Metr; 2014; 12():20. PubMed ID: 26019690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
