BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16766175)

  • 1. Environmental odours assessment from waste treatment plants: dynamic olfactometry in combination with sensorial analysers "electronic noses".
    Littarru P
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(2):302-9. PubMed ID: 16766175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of electronic noses for detection of odour from animal production facilities: a review.
    Nimmermark S
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):33-41. PubMed ID: 11762481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of different approaches used to regulate odours around the world.
    Mahin TD
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):87-102. PubMed ID: 11762488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Olfactometric approach for the evaluation of citizens' exposure to industrial emissions in the city of Terni, Italy.
    Capelli L; Sironi S; Del Rosso R; Céntola P; Rossi A; Austeri C
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Jan; 409(3):595-603. PubMed ID: 21106227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterisation of odour masking agents often used in the solid waste industry for odour abatement.
    Decottignies V; Filippi G; Bruchet A
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 55(5):359-64. PubMed ID: 17489429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. H2S, VOC, TOC, electronic noses and odour concentration: use and comparison of different parameters for emission measurement on air treatment systems.
    Franke W; Frechen FB; Giebel S
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(9):1721-6. PubMed ID: 19448306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electronic Noses and Their Applications for Sensory and Analytical Measurements in the Waste Management Plants-A Review.
    Jońca J; Pawnuk M; Arsen A; Sówka I
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Feb; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 35214407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Usual variables and odour concentration to evaluate composting process and odour impact.
    Gutiérrez MC; Martín MA; Chica AF
    Environ Technol; 2014; 35(5-8):709-18. PubMed ID: 24645451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Continuous monitoring of odours from a composting plant using electronic noses.
    Sironi S; Capelli L; Céntola P; Del Rosso R; Il Grande M
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(3):389-97. PubMed ID: 16574395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evolution of Electronic Noses from Research Objects to Engineered Environmental Odour Monitoring Systems: A Review of Standardization Approaches.
    Cipriano D; Capelli L
    Biosensors (Basel); 2019 May; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 31159226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pragmatic evaluation of odour emissions from a rendering plant in southern Brazil.
    Vieira MM; Schirmer WN; de Melo Lisboa H; Belli Filho P; Guillot JM
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Dec; 23(23):24115-24124. PubMed ID: 27640055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Environmental performance of an industrial biofilter: Relationship between photochemical oxidation and odorous impacts.
    Reyes J; Gutiérrez MC; Toledo M; Vera L; Sánchez L; Siles JA; Martín MA
    Environ Res; 2020 Apr; 183():109168. PubMed ID: 32004831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The need for electronic noses for environmental odour exposure assessment.
    Capelli L; Dentoni L; Sironi S; Del Rosso R
    Water Sci Technol; 2014; 69(1):135-41. PubMed ID: 24434979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The modelling of odour dispersion as a support tool for the improvements of high odours impact plants.
    Luciano A; Torretta V; Mancini G; Eleuteri A; Raboni M; Viotti P
    Environ Technol; 2017 Mar; 38(5):588-597. PubMed ID: 27384238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of the dynamics of odour emissions from pig farms using dynamic olfactometry and an electronic odour sensor.
    Brose G; Gallmann E; Hartung E; Jungbluth T
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):59-64. PubMed ID: 11762484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of different measurement methods of odour and odorants used in the odour impact assessment of wastewater treatment plants in Poland.
    Barczak RJ; Kulig A
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 Feb; 75(3-4):944-951. PubMed ID: 28234294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Real-Time Monitoring of Odour Emissions at the Fenceline of a Waste Treatment Plant by Instrumental Odour Monitoring Systems: Focus on Training Methods.
    Ratti C; Bax C; Lotesoriere BJ; Capelli L
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 May; 24(11):. PubMed ID: 38894297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Odour detection methods: olfactometry and chemical sensors.
    Brattoli M; de Gennaro G; de Pinto V; Loiotile AD; Lovascio S; Penza M
    Sensors (Basel); 2011; 11(5):5290-322. PubMed ID: 22163901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measurement of odour with focus on sampling techniques.
    Bockreis A; Steinberg I
    Waste Manag; 2005; 25(9):859-63. PubMed ID: 16140516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A case study of odour nuisance evaluation in the context of integrated urban planning.
    Badach J; Kolasińska P; Paciorek M; Wojnowski W; Dymerski T; Gębicki J; Dymnicka M; Namieśnik J
    J Environ Manage; 2018 May; 213():417-424. PubMed ID: 29505997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.