These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16767817)
1. [Present and future of analog image and digital image on mammography in closing the symposium]. Kodera Y Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2006 May; 62(5):635-6. PubMed ID: 16767817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Changes in radiological technology research for medical imaging: from analogue to digital image studies]. JSRT Imaging Section Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Jan; 70(1):89-101. PubMed ID: 24464069 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Symposium 2: the problems and the future perspectives of the digital mammography]. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Dec; 69(12):1419-35. PubMed ID: 24366563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The current status of digital mammography. James JJ Clin Radiol; 2004 Jan; 59(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 14697370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital mammography: an update. Schulz-Wendtland R; Fuchsjäger M; Wacker T; Hermann KP Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 19592186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Experiences with using digital systems in radiology]. Busch HP Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Nov; 6(6):353-4. PubMed ID: 9081412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital mammography: coming of age. Morin RL; Maidment AD J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Sep; 2(9):798-801. PubMed ID: 17411931 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Future of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography. Covington MF; Pizzitola VJ; Lorans R; Pockaj BA; Northfelt DW; Appleton CM; Patel BK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):292-300. PubMed ID: 29064748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The evolution of digital radiography: from storage phosphors to flat-panel detectors. Porcelli A; Maggi F; Spalvieri S; Meduri A; Marano P Rays; 2003; 28(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 14509175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Workflow in digital screening mammography]. Bick U; Diekmann F; Fallenberg EM Radiologe; 2008 Apr; 48(4):335-44. PubMed ID: 18305919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital mammography: current state and future aspects. Fischer U; Hermann KP; Baum F Eur Radiol; 2006 Jan; 16(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 16132935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On line for digital mammography. D'Orsi CJ; Karellas A Lancet; 1995 Jul; 346(8970):263-4. PubMed ID: 7630243 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Technical innovation in equine radiology: what's changed? Beccati F Vet Rec; 2016 May; 178(21):528-30. PubMed ID: 27199047 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Perspectives and problems of digital radiography at the beginning of the third millennium. Marano P Rays; 2003; 28(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 14509174 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Point/Counterpoint. Cone beam x-ray CT will be superior to digital x-ray tomosynthesis in imaging the breast and delineating cancer. Karellas A; Lo JY; Orton CG Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):409-11. PubMed ID: 18383660 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital mammography: do we need to convert now? Gur D Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 17885175 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Clinical results of digital mammography]. Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Bautz W Radiologe; 2005 Mar; 45(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 15744483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]