These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16767818)

  • 21. Digital mammography.
    Pisano ED; Yaffe MJ
    Radiology; 2005 Feb; 234(2):353-62. PubMed ID: 15670993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work?
    Scarfe WC; Farman AG
    Dent Clin North Am; 2008 Oct; 52(4):707-30, v. PubMed ID: 18805225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Can the average glandular dose in routine digital mammography screening be reduced? A pilot study using revised image quality criteria.
    Hemdal B; Andersson I; Grahn A; Håkansson M; Ruschin M; Thilander-Klang A; Båth M; Börjesson S; Medin J; Tingberg A; Månsson LG; Mattsson S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):383-8. PubMed ID: 15933142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Image quality assessment and radiation doses in intraoral radiography.
    Yakoumakis EN; Tierris CE; Stefanou EP; Phanourakis IG; Proukakis CC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 11250637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. For mammography, it's digital vs. screen-film.
    D'Orsi CJ; Karellas A
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Nov; Suppl Digital():D16-8. PubMed ID: 10724730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
    Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
    Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quantitative assessment of computed radiography quality control parameters.
    Rampado O; Isoardi P; Ropolo R
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1577-93. PubMed ID: 16510964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Are phantoms useful for predicting the potential of dose reduction in full-field digital mammography?
    Gennaro G; Katz L; Souchay H; Alberelli C; di Maggio C
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Apr; 50(8):1851-70. PubMed ID: 15815100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Data and image processing for abdominal imaging.
    Bidaut L
    Abdom Imaging; 2000; 25(4):341-60. PubMed ID: 10926186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Digital tomosynthesis aided by low-resolution exact computed tomography.
    Zeng K; Yu H; Zhao S; Fajardo LL; Ruth C; Jing Z; Wang G
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(6):976-83. PubMed ID: 18043366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Autoradiographic image intensification: applications in medical radiography.
    Askins BS
    Science; 1978 Feb; 199(4329):684-6. PubMed ID: 625659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Present and future of analog image and digital image on mammography in closing the symposium].
    Kodera Y
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2006 May; 62(5):635-6. PubMed ID: 16767817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [From the point of view of a radiological technologist].
    Nishide H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2009 Oct; 65(10):1418-20. PubMed ID: 19928300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Electrostatic methods of imaging in diagnostic radiology.
    Johns HE; Plewes D; Fenster A
    Can J Otolaryngol; 1975; 4(1):102-10. PubMed ID: 1131713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Proceedings: Radiation dosage in mammography.
    Asbury DL; Barker PG
    Br J Surg; 1975 Feb; 62(2):163. PubMed ID: 1115917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Report on the 12th International Workshop on Breast Imaging (IWDM 2014)].
    Fujita H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Dec; 70(12):1483-6. PubMed ID: 25672453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Digital pelvic radiology: increase distance to reduce dose.
    Warner R
    Radiol Technol; 2012; 83(3):303. PubMed ID: 22267699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reciprocity law failure with film/screen combinations for mammography.
    Seelentag WW; Panzer W
    Br J Radiol; 1978 Jul; 51(607):529-31. PubMed ID: 667524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Film quality in mammary radiography.
    Deichgräber E; Reichmann S; Burén M
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1974 Jan; 15(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 4821727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dose reduction in mammography - what reduction? Which dose?
    Gur D
    Med Phys; 1978; 5(2):167-8. PubMed ID: 683159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.