These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16767819)

  • 1. [Mammography for diagnosticians: what information is needed for diagnosis].
    Endo T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2006 May; 62(5):642-8. PubMed ID: 16767819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comments on the article "Focus measurement and geometric lack of focus in mammography equipment"].
    Andersson O
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1994 Nov; 4(6):351-2. PubMed ID: 7819303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fundamentals of digital mammography: physics, technology and practical considerations.
    Smith A
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(5):18-24, 26-31; quiz 32-4. PubMed ID: 14603590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Digital magnification mammography. A new technique for improved visualization of microcalcifications in breast cancer diagnosis].
    Reuther G; Hoffmann R; Bier B
    Radiologe; 1993 May; 33(5):260-6. PubMed ID: 8516436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The technique and results of mammography].
    Friedrich M
    Radiologe; 1993 May; 33(5):243-59. PubMed ID: 8516435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital mammography: performance considerations and current detector designs.
    Williams MB; Fajardo LL
    Acad Radiol; 1996 May; 3(5):429-37. PubMed ID: 8796697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnification mammography.
    Wysocki ML; DeVos D
    Radiol Technol; 1997; 68(3):241-3. PubMed ID: 9008019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital mammography better for some women. New technology helps see through breast tissue that can hide cancers.
    Harv Womens Health Watch; 2005 Nov; 13(3):1-2. PubMed ID: 16408349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Mammography].
    Endo T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Jun; 59(6):700-6. PubMed ID: 12881674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The stationary grid in mammography: its clinical evaluation].
    Draghi F; Ferrozzi G; Ferrozzi F; Ferranti C
    Radiol Med; 1993; 85(1-2):96-102. PubMed ID: 8480057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Initial clinical experiences with grid mammography].
    Lauth G; Eulenburg R; Zwiens G; Duda V
    Rontgenblatter; 1983 Sep; 36(9):281-4. PubMed ID: 6635485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Imaging diagnosis of breast cancer].
    Fujimitsu R; Okazaki M; Ida M
    Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Jun; 65 Suppl 6():235-40. PubMed ID: 17682160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital and film mammography.
    Crystal P; Strano S
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Feb; 354(7):765-7; author reply 765-7. PubMed ID: 16481649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital and film mammography.
    Keen JD
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Feb; 354(7):765-7; author reply 765-7. PubMed ID: 16482674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Digital mammography with high-resolution storage plates (CR) versus full-field digital mammography (CCD) (DR) for microcalcifications and focal lesions -- a retrospective clinical histologic analysis (n = 102)].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Lell M; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Dassel MS; Bautz W
    Rofo; 2005 Jan; 177(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 15657822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography: image quality and lesion detection.
    Fischmann A; Siegmann KC; Wersebe A; Claussen CD; Müller-Schimpfle M
    Br J Radiol; 2005 Apr; 78(928):312-5. PubMed ID: 15774591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Follow-up of surgical biopsies in microcalcifications of the breast. Comparative analysis of patients submitted to mammography and digitalization of mammographic images].
    Rulli A; Cirocchi R; Vento AR; Naninato P; Zanetti A; Carli L
    Minerva Chir; 1997; 52(7-8):933-6. PubMed ID: 9411295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Film or digital mammographic screening?
    Dershaw DD
    N Engl J Med; 2005 Oct; 353(17):1846-7. PubMed ID: 16251541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mammographic image receptors and image processing.
    Kimme-Smith C
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1990 Oct; 2(5):719-25. PubMed ID: 2245152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Further experience with microfocal spot magnification mammography in the assessment of clustered breast microcalcifications.
    Sickles EA
    Radiology; 1980 Oct; 137(1 Pt 1):9-14. PubMed ID: 7422866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.