These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
44. The human rights impact of gender stereotyping in the context of reproductive health care. O'Connell C; Zampas C Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Jan; 144(1):116-121. PubMed ID: 30311945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Womb for rent: Norplant and the undoing of poor women. Vance JL Hastings Constit Law Q; 1994; 21(3):827-55. PubMed ID: 11863029 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Up against eugenics: disabled women's challenge to receive reproductive health services. Waxman BF Sex Disabil; 1994; 12(2):155-71. PubMed ID: 11656410 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Democrats vow to strengthen Medicare and Medicaid and preserve women's health rights. Tanne JH BMJ; 2012 Sep; 345():e6103. PubMed ID: 22963950 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Health care and civil rights: an introduction. Teitelbaum JB Ethn Dis; 2005; 15(2 Suppl 2):S27-30. PubMed ID: 15822834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Prenatal v. parental rights: what a difference an "a" makes. Gallagher A St Marys Law J; 1989; 21(2):301-24. PubMed ID: 16100799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. A woman's right to choose: wrongful death statutes and abortion rights--consistent at last. Siano JR Womens Rights Law Report; 1998; 19(3):279-92. PubMed ID: 15871153 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Gender discrimination in the medical community. Scott AK Update; 1995 Jul; 11(2):E1. PubMed ID: 16130241 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. A Violent Birth: Reframing Coerced Procedures During Childbirth as Obstetric Violence. Borges MT Duke Law J; 2018 Jan; 67(4):827-62. PubMed ID: 29469554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Degendering reproduction? Jackson E Med Law Rev; 2008; 16(3):346-68. PubMed ID: 18695265 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation. Van Detta JA South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. An equal protection analysis of United States reproductive health policy: gender, race, age, and class. Colker R Duke Law J; 1991 Apr; (2):324-64. PubMed ID: 10114913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. [Sower, inseminator, and faithful fighter for the future; or, masculinity in Austrian social democracy, 1888-1934]. Pasteur P Mouv Soc; 2002; (198):35-53. PubMed ID: 17500112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Women of color and health: issues of gender, community, and power. Scales-Trent J Stanford Law Rev; 1991 Jul; 43(6):1357-68. PubMed ID: 10131161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Coercion and long-term contraceptives. Steinbock B Hastings Cent Rep; 1995; 25(1):S19-22. PubMed ID: 7730038 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Social work and the Supreme Court: a clash of values; a time for action. Lens V Soc Work; 2004 Apr; 49(2):327-30. PubMed ID: 15124975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]