987 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16768372)
1. Orienting attention to points in time improves stimulus processing both within and across modalities.
Lange K; Röder B
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):715-29. PubMed ID: 16768372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
Sambo CF; Forster B
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Orienting and maintenance of spatial attention in audition and vision: an event-related brain potential study.
Salmi J; Rinne T; Degerman A; Alho K
Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Jun; 25(12):3725-33. PubMed ID: 17610592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cross-modal interactions between audition, touch, and vision in endogenous spatial attention: ERP evidence on preparatory states and sensory modulations.
Eimer M; van Velzen J; Driver J
J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Feb; 14(2):254-71. PubMed ID: 11970790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Attending to visual or auditory motion affects perception within and across modalities: an event-related potential study.
Beer AL; Röder B
Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 21(4):1116-30. PubMed ID: 15787717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Crossmodal and intermodal attention modulate event-related brain potentials to tactile and auditory stimuli.
Hötting K; Rösler F; Röder B
Exp Brain Res; 2003 Jan; 148(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 12478394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An event-related brain potential study of cross-modal links in spatial attention between vision and touch.
Eimer M; Driver J
Psychophysiology; 2000 Sep; 37(5):697-705. PubMed ID: 11037046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The time-course of auditory and visual distraction effects in a new crossmodal paradigm.
Bendixen A; Grimm S; Deouell LY; Wetzel N; Mädebach A; Schröger E
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2130-9. PubMed ID: 20385149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perceptual and cognitive task difficulty has differential effects on auditory distraction.
Muller-Gass A; Schröger E
Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1136(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 17223092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Selective attention and multisensory integration: multiple phases of effects on the evoked brain activity.
Talsma D; Woldorff MG
J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Jul; 17(7):1098-114. PubMed ID: 16102239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ERP evidence for cross-modal audiovisual effects of endogenous spatial attention within hemifields.
Eimer M; van Velzen J; Driver J
J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):272-88. PubMed ID: 15068597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Time-varying cortical activations related to visual-tactile cross-modal links in spatial selective attention.
Kida T; Inui K; Wasaka T; Akatsuka K; Tanaka E; Kakigi R
J Neurophysiol; 2007 May; 97(5):3585-96. PubMed ID: 17360823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Neural correlates of cross-modally induced changes in tactile awareness.
Hötting K; Friedrich CK; Röder B
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2445-61. PubMed ID: 19199403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Altered auditory-tactile interactions in congenitally blind humans: an event-related potential study.
Hötting K; Rösler F; Röder B
Exp Brain Res; 2004 Dec; 159(3):370-81. PubMed ID: 15241575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Signal reliability modulates auditory-tactile integration for event counting.
Bresciani JP; Ernst MO
Neuroreport; 2007 Jul; 18(11):1157-61. PubMed ID: 17589318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intermodal spatial attention differs between vision and audition: an event-related potential analysis.
Talsma D; Kok A
Psychophysiology; 2002 Nov; 39(6):689-706. PubMed ID: 12462498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Attention and sensory interactions within the occipital cortex in the early blind: an fMRI study.
Weaver KE; Stevens AA
J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Feb; 19(2):315-30. PubMed ID: 17280519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Congenitally blind humans use different stimulus selection strategies in hearing: an ERP study of spatial and temporal attention.
Röder B; Krämer UM; Lange K
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2007; 25(3-4):311-22. PubMed ID: 17943008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
