These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16768984)
21. Clinical inquiries. Are breast self-exams or clinical exams effective for screening breast cancer? Gaskie S; Nashelsky J J Fam Pract; 2005 Sep; 54(9):803-4. PubMed ID: 16144594 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Is there a role for magnetic resonance imaging in a population-based breast cancer screening program? Sweeney KJ; Sacchini V Breast J; 2007; 13(6):543-4. PubMed ID: 17983392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The contribution of clinical breast examination to the accuracy of breast screening. Chiarelli AM; Majpruz V; Brown P; Thériault M; Shumak R; Mai V J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(18):1236-43. PubMed ID: 19720967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Mammography screening in women 40 to 49 years old. Léger MM; McNellis R; JAAPA; 2007 Nov; 20(11):16, 18. PubMed ID: 18035758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. MRI and mammography surveillance of women at increased risk for breast cancer: recommendations using an evidence-based approach. Granader EJ; Dwamena B; Carlos RC Acad Radiol; 2008 Dec; 15(12):1590-5. PubMed ID: 19000876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Physician and patient characteristics associated with outpatient breast cancer screening recommendations in the United States: analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey Data 1996-2004. Bhosle M; Samuel S; Vosuri V; Paskett E; Balkrishnan R Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 May; 103(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 17028978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Screening for breast cancer: is it globally applicable? Mittra I Nat Clin Pract Oncol; 2008 Feb; 5(2):60-1. PubMed ID: 18059392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Do more women lose their breast after screening?]. Hessov I; Garne JP Ugeskr Laeger; 2001 Jan; 163(4):446-7. PubMed ID: 11218782 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Mass screening for breast cancer. Strax P Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1973 Jun; 68(6):457-66. PubMed ID: 17474655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Do more women lose their breast following screening--and when are we supposed to discuss it?]. Olsen O; Gøtzsche PC Ugeskr Laeger; 2001 Mar; 163(11):1576. PubMed ID: 11268815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Mammography screening in Germany: how, when and why?]. Bick U Rofo; 2006 Oct; 178(10):957-69. PubMed ID: 17021975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Evidence based medicine hit list 2000. Mammography update--sequelae for screening. 1]. Hamm K Radiologe; 2002 Oct; 42(10):M175-8. PubMed ID: 12402118 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Honest information about mammography screening, please!]. Gøtzsche PC; Jørgensen KJ Lakartidningen; 2009 Oct 28-Nov 3; 106(44):2860-1. PubMed ID: 19967966 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Adjusting mammography--audit recommendations in a lower-incidence Taiwanese population. Chen CY; Tzeng WS; Tsai CC; Mak CW; Chen CH; Chou MC J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Sep; 5(9):978-85. PubMed ID: 18755438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Web-based proactive system to improve breast cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial. Chaudhry R; Scheitel SM; McMurtry EK; Leutink DJ; Cabanela RL; Naessens JM; Rahman AS; Davis LA; Stroebel RJ Arch Intern Med; 2007 Mar; 167(6):606-11. PubMed ID: 17389293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Reducing the effects of lead-time bias, length bias and over-detection in evaluating screening mammography: a censored bivariate data approach. Mahnken JD; Chan W; Freeman DH; Freeman JL Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Dec; 17(6):643-63. PubMed ID: 18445697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Reported drop in mammography : is this cause for concern? Breen N; A Cronin K; Meissner HI; Taplin SH; Tangka FK; Tiro JA; McNeel TS Cancer; 2007 Jun; 109(12):2405-9. PubMed ID: 17503429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]