338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16770184)
1. Anthropometric precision and accuracy of digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: comparing the Genex and 3dMD imaging systems with one another and with direct anthropometry.
Weinberg SM; Naidoo S; Govier DP; Martin RA; Kane AA; Marazita ML
J Craniofac Surg; 2006 May; 17(3):477-83. PubMed ID: 16770184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison study of different facial soft tissue analysis methods.
Kook MS; Jung S; Park HJ; Oh HK; Ryu SY; Cho JH; Lee JS; Yoon SJ; Kim MS; Shin HK
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 24954528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: evaluation of anthropometric precision and accuracy using a Genex 3D camera system.
Weinberg SM; Scott NM; Neiswanger K; Brandon CA; Marazita ML
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2004 Sep; 41(5):507-18. PubMed ID: 15352857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Orthodontic soft-tissue parameters: a comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and the 3dMD imaging system.
Metzger TE; Kula KS; Eckert GJ; Ghoneima AA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):672-81. PubMed ID: 24182583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity of the 3D VECTRA photogrammetric surface imaging system for cranio-maxillofacial anthropometric measurements.
Metzler P; Sun Y; Zemann W; Bartella A; Lehner M; Obwegeser JA; Kruse-Gujer AL; Lübbers HT
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 18(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 23559195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup.
Moerenhout BA; Gelaude F; Swennen GR; Casselman JW; Van Der Sloten J; Mommaerts MY
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 18815053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Reliability of iWitness photogrammetry in maxillofacial application].
Jiang C; Song Q; He W; Chen S; Hong T
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Jun; 33(3):296-300. PubMed ID: 26281261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional anthropometric analysis of chinese faces and its application in evaluating facial deformity.
Dong Y; Zhao Y; Bai S; Wu G; Zhou L; Wang B
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 69(4):1195-206. PubMed ID: 21050632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Precision and accuracy of the 3dMD photogrammetric system in craniomaxillofacial application.
Lübbers HT; Medinger L; Kruse A; Grätz KW; Matthews F
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):763-7. PubMed ID: 20485043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetry: Comparison of the 3dMD and Bellus3D facial scanning systems with one another and with direct anthropometry.
Liu J; Zhang C; Cai R; Yao Y; Zhao Z; Liao W
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Dec; 160(6):862-871. PubMed ID: 34814981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy and reliability of 3D stereophotogrammetry: A comparison to direct anthropometry and 2D photogrammetry.
Dindaroğlu F; Kutlu P; Duran GS; Görgülü S; Aslan E
Angle Orthod; 2016 May; 86(3):487-94. PubMed ID: 26267357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity and reliability of craniofacial anthropometric measurement of 3D digital photogrammetric images.
Wong JY; Oh AK; Ohta E; Hunt AT; Rogers GF; Mulliken JB; Deutsch CK
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2008 May; 45(3):232-9. PubMed ID: 18452351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of 3D Facial Models Obtained from CBCT Volume Wrapping.
Premjani P; Al-Mulla AH; Ferguson DJ
J Clin Orthod; 2015 Oct; 49(10):641-6. PubMed ID: 26562392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A 3D analysis of Caucasian and African American facial morphologies in a US population.
Talbert L; Kau CH; Christou T; Vlachos C; Souccar N
J Orthod; 2014 Mar; 41(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 24671286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preliminary evaluation of an electromagnetic three-dimensional digitizer in facial anthropometry.
Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Poggio CE; Cova M; Tartaglia G
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1998 Jan; 35(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 9482218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Distances between facial landmarks can be measured accurately with a new digital 3-dimensional video system.
Schimmel M; Christou P; Houstis O; Herrmann FR; Kiliaridis S; Müller F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):580.e1-580.e10; discussion 580-1. PubMed ID: 20451768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Sudanese female face: normative craniofacial measurements and comparison with African-American and North American White females.
Salah M; Higzi MA; Ali RW; Naini FB
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1704-9. PubMed ID: 25012648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the 3dMDface system as a tool for soft tissue analysis.
Hong C; Choi K; Kachroo Y; Kwon T; Nguyen A; McComb R; Moon W
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2017 Jun; 20 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):119-124. PubMed ID: 28643910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional facial imaging: accuracy and considerations for clinical applications in orthodontics.
Lee JY; Han Q; Trotman CA
Angle Orthod; 2004 Oct; 74(5):587-93. PubMed ID: 15529491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Anatolian Turkish adults.
Kale-Varlk S
J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 19(6):1481-6. PubMed ID: 19098536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
