These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16770184)

  • 21. Comparison of Direct and Digital Measures of Cranial Vault Asymmetry for Assessment of Plagiocephaly.
    Skolnick GB; Naidoo SD; Nguyen DC; Patel KB; Woo AS
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 26(6):1900-3. PubMed ID: 26267578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of simulated intraoral variables on the accuracy of a photogrammetric imaging technique for complete-arch implant prostheses.
    Bratos M; Bergin JM; Rubenstein JE; Sorensen JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):232-241. PubMed ID: 29559220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A 3D anthropometric analysis of the orolabial region in Chinese young adults.
    Jayaratne YS; Deutsch CK; Zwahlen RA
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 51(8):908-12. PubMed ID: 24094549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of Face Anthropometry and Digital 2D-Face Photogrammetry as Methods for Predicting Vertical Dimension of Occlusion.
    Strajnić L; Perić M; Živković N; Lemić AM; Vučinić N; Miličić B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Jun; (3):282-292. PubMed ID: 37824121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. High-Fidelity Anthropometric Facial Measurements Can Be Obtained From a Single Stereophotograph From the Vectra H1 3-Dimensional Camera.
    Jodeh DS; Rottgers SA
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2019 Oct; 56(9):1164-1170. PubMed ID: 30955356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Noninvasive computerized scanning method for the correlation between the facial soft and hard tissues for an integrated three-dimensional anthropometry and cephalometry.
    Galantucci LM; Percoco G; Lavecchia F; Di Gioia E
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):797-804. PubMed ID: 23714883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Digital 2D-photogrammetry and direct anthropometry--a comparing study on test accomplishment and measurement data.
    Franke-Gromberg C; Schüler G; Hermanussen M; Scheffler C
    Anthropol Anz; 2010; 68(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 20954452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The 3dMD photogrammetric photo system in cranio-maxillofacial surgery: Validation of interexaminer variations and perceptions.
    Nord F; Ferjencik R; Seifert B; Lanzer M; Gander T; Matthews F; Rücker M; Lübbers HT
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Nov; 43(9):1798-803. PubMed ID: 26421470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Craniofacial measurements based on 3D-CT volume rendering: implications for clinical applications.
    Cavalcanti MG; Rocha SS; Vannier MW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 May; 33(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 15371317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The accuracy of matching three-dimensional photographs with skin surfaces derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
    Maal TJ; Plooij JM; Rangel FA; Mollemans W; Schutyser FA; Bergé SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jul; 37(7):641-6. PubMed ID: 18539435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Assessment of precision and accuracy of digital surface photogrammetry with the DSP 400 system].
    Krimmel M; Kluba S; Dietz K; Reinert S
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Mar; 50(3):45-53. PubMed ID: 15832575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of facial morphologies between adult Chinese and Houstonian Caucasian populations using three-dimensional imaging.
    Wirthlin J; Kau CH; English JD; Pan F; Zhou H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 42(9):1100-7. PubMed ID: 23623784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy and precision of a 3D anthropometric facial analysis with and without landmark labeling before image acquisition.
    Aynechi N; Larson BE; Leon-Salazar V; Beiraghi S
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Mar; 81(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 21208076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Picture perfect? Reliability of craniofacial anthropometry using three-dimensional digital stereophotogrammetry.
    Heike CL; Cunningham ML; Hing AV; Stuhaug E; Starr JR
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 Oct; 124(4):1261-1272. PubMed ID: 19935311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy and reproducibility of the DAVID SLS-2 scanner in three-dimensional facial imaging.
    Secher JJ; Darvann TA; Pinholt EM
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Oct; 45(10):1662-1670. PubMed ID: 28847623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of some facial anthropometric parameters in an Iranian population: infancy through adolescence.
    Jahanbin A; Rashed R; Yazdani R; Shahri NM; Kianifar H
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):941-5. PubMed ID: 23714916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Application of three-dimensional digital models for the morphometric analysis of predentition plasters: accuracy and precision.
    Kaihara Y; Katayama A; Iwamae S; Kihara T; Ono K; Kurose M; Amano H; Nikawa H; Kozai K
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2014 Dec; 15(4):360-6. PubMed ID: 25517580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on facial images captured on a 3D camera.
    Othman SA; Ahmad R; Mericant AF; Jamaludin M
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 23785939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of smiling on facial asymmetry in adults: a 3D evaluation.
    Darby LJ; Millett DT; Kelly N; McIntyre GT; Cronin MS
    Aust Orthod J; 2015 Nov; 31(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 26999885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Measuring digit lengths with 3D digital stereophotogrammetry: A comparison across methods.
    Gremba A; Weinberg SM
    Am J Hum Biol; 2018 Jul; 30(4):e23133. PubMed ID: 29744967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.