883 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16770211)
1. Complications associated with minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Podichetty VK; Spears J; Isaacs RE; Booher J; Biscup RS
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 May; 19(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 16770211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive lumbar spinal decompression in the elderly: outcomes of 50 patients aged 75 years and older.
Rosen DS; O'Toole JE; Eichholz KM; Hrubes M; Huo D; Sandhu FA; Fessler RG
Neurosurgery; 2007 Mar; 60(3):503-9; discussion 509-10. PubMed ID: 17327795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of techniques for decompressive lumbar laminectomy: the minimally invasive versus the "classic" open approach.
Rahman M; Summers LE; Richter B; Mimran RI; Jacob RP
Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2008 Apr; 51(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 18401823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression for the lumbar spine: a minimally invasive new procedure for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Hatta Y; Shiraishi T; Sakamoto A; Yato Y; Harada T; Mikami Y; Hase H; Kubo T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(8):E276-80. PubMed ID: 19365236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk factors for the development of perioperative complications in elderly patients undergoing lumbar decompression and arthrodesis for spinal stenosis: an analysis of 166 patients.
Cassinelli EH; Eubanks J; Vogt M; Furey C; Yoo J; Bohlman HH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(2):230-5. PubMed ID: 17224819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a minimal invasive surgery.
Usman M; Ali M; Khanzada K; Ishaq M; Naeem-ul-Haq ; Aman R; Ali M
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2013 Dec; 23(12):852-6. PubMed ID: 24304987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Complications of open compared to minimally invasive lumbar spine decompression.
Shih P; Wong AP; Smith TR; Lee AI; Fessler RG
J Clin Neurosci; 2011 Oct; 18(10):1360-4. PubMed ID: 21775145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Midterm outcome after microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: 4-year prospective study.
Castro-Menéndez M; Bravo-Ricoy JA; Casal-Moro R; Hernández-Blanco M; Jorge-Barreiro FJ
Neurosurgery; 2009 Jul; 65(1):100-10; discussion 110; quiz A12. PubMed ID: 19574831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term results of microsurgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis by unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression.
Oertel MF; Ryang YM; Korinth MC; Gilsbach JM; Rohde V
Neurosurgery; 2006 Dec; 59(6):1264-9; discussion 1269-70. PubMed ID: 17277689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of indirect decompression of the lumbar spinal canal following minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion: radiographic and outcome analysis.
Elowitz EH; Yanni DS; Chwajol M; Starke RM; Perin NI
Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2011 Oct; 54(5-6):201-6. PubMed ID: 22278781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for the treatment of lumbar stenosis.
Khoo LT; Fessler RG
Neurosurgery; 2002 Nov; 51(5 Suppl):S146-54. PubMed ID: 12234442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term outcomes of two different decompressive techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Fu YS; Zeng BF; Xu JG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar; 33(5):514-8. PubMed ID: 18317196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly: preoperative expectations and postoperative satisfaction.
Gepstein R; Arinzon Z; Adunsky A; Folman Y
Spinal Cord; 2006 Jul; 44(7):427-31. PubMed ID: 16304562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Microscope-assisted minimally invasive decompression for degenerative lower lumbar spinal stenosis].
Chen X; Ge XF; Yan L
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2009 Oct; 22(10):757-8. PubMed ID: 19902754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Observations on the safety and efficacy of surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis in geriatric patients.
Fredman B; Arinzon Z; Zohar E; Shabat S; Jedeikin R; Fidelman ZG; Gepstein R
Eur Spine J; 2002 Dec; 11(6):571-4. PubMed ID: 12522715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Less invasive calibration of lumbar canal stenosis. Results with a tubular muscle retraction system used in 35 patients].
Faure PA; Caire F; Moreau JJ
Neurochirurgie; 2007 Feb; 53(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 17350053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spinal stenosis surgery in pediatric patients with achondroplasia.
Sciubba DM; Noggle JC; Marupudi NI; Bagley CA; Bookland MJ; Carson BS; Ain MC; Jallo GI
J Neurosurg; 2007 May; 106(5 Suppl):372-8. PubMed ID: 17566204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bilateral interlaminar fenestration and unroofing for the decompression of nerve roots by using a unilateral approach in lumbar canal stenosis.
Iwatsuki K; Yoshimine T; Aoki M
Surg Neurol; 2007 Nov; 68(5):487-92; discussion 492. PubMed ID: 17825382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Bilateral "over the top" decompression through unilateral laminotomy for lumbar and thoracic spinal canal stenosis].
Banczerowski P; Lipóth L; Veres R
Ideggyogy Sz; 2007 Nov; 60(11-12):467-73. PubMed ID: 18198793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Controversies about instrumented surgery and pain relief in degenerative lumbar spine pain. Results of scientific evidence].
Robaina-Padrón FJ
Neurocirugia (Astur); 2007 Oct; 18(5):406-13. PubMed ID: 18008014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
