These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16770500)

  • 1. Microbiological water quality of the Mfoundi River watershed at Yaoundé, Cameroon, as inferred from indicator bacteria of fecal contamination.
    Djuikom E; Njine T; Nola M; Sikati V; Jugnia LB
    Environ Monit Assess; 2006 Nov; 122(1-3):171-83. PubMed ID: 16770500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Physicochemical water quality of the Mfoundi River watershed at Yaoundé, Cameroon, and its relevance to the distribution of bacterial indicators of faecal contamination.
    Djuikom E; Jugnia LB; Nola M; Foto S; Sikati V
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(11):2841-9. PubMed ID: 19934505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fecal bacteria in the rivers of the Seine drainage network (France): sources, fate and modelling.
    Servais P; Garcia-Armisen T; George I; Billen G
    Sci Total Environ; 2007 Apr; 375(1-3):152-67. PubMed ID: 17239424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fecal coliform accumulation within a river subject to seasonally-disinfected wastewater discharges.
    Mitch AA; Gasner KC; Mitch WA
    Water Res; 2010 Sep; 44(16):4776-82. PubMed ID: 20580053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Tracing the Fecal Contamination Sources Based on Bacteroides 16S rRNA PCR- DGGE in Karst Groundwater: Taking Laolongdong Underground River System, Nanshan, Chongqing as an Example].
    Zhang H; Jiang YJ; Zhang YZ; Duan YF; Lü XF; He QF
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2016 May; 37(5):1805-13. PubMed ID: 27506034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Evaluation of bacterial and polluting loads of effluent from activated sludge wastewater treatment plants in Yaounde, Cameroon].
    Njiné T; Monkiédjé A; Nola M; Foko VS
    Sante; 2001; 11(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 11440881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigating the fate and transport of fecal coliform contamination in a tidal estuarine system using a three-dimensional model.
    Chen WB; Liu WC
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2017 Mar; 116(1-2):365-384. PubMed ID: 28117132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An assessment of fecal indicator bacteria-based water quality standards.
    Gronewold AD; Borsuk ME; Wolpert RL; Reckhow KH
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Jul; 42(13):4676-82. PubMed ID: 18677990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Bacteriological quality of spring and well water in Yaounde (Cameroon)].
    Nola M; Njine T; Monkiedje A; Foko VS; Djuikom E; Tailliez R
    Sante; 1998; 8(5):330-6. PubMed ID: 9854008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modeling fecal coliform contamination in a tidal Danshuei River estuarine system.
    Liu WC; Chan WT; Young CC
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Jan; 502():632-40. PubMed ID: 25302451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Uncertainty assessment for three-dimensional hydrodynamic and fecal coliform modeling in the Danshuei River estuarine system: The influence of first-order parametric decay reaction.
    Young CC; Liu WC; Liu HM
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2023 Aug; 193():115220. PubMed ID: 37390625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of bacterial indicators and methods in rural surface waters.
    Kloot RW; Radakovich B; Huang X; Brantley DD
    Environ Monit Assess; 2006 Oct; 121(1-3):275-87. PubMed ID: 16741789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterization of sources and loadings of fecal pollutants using microbial source tracking assays in urban and rural areas of the Grand River Watershed, Southwestern Ontario.
    Lee DY; Lee H; Trevors JT; Weir SC; Thomas JL; Habash M
    Water Res; 2014 Apr; 53():123-31. PubMed ID: 24509346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Precipitation thresholds for fecal bacterial indicators in the Chesapeake Bay.
    Leight AK; Hood RR
    Water Res; 2018 Aug; 139():252-262. PubMed ID: 29655096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of total coliform, fecal coliform, and enterococcus bacterial indicator response for ocean recreational water quality testing.
    Noble RT; Moore DF; Leecaster MK; McGee CD; Weisberg SB
    Water Res; 2003 Apr; 37(7):1637-43. PubMed ID: 12600392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the microbial quality of a tropical watershed with an urbanization gradient using traditional and alternate fecal indicators.
    Santiago-Rodriguez TM; Toranzos GA; Arce-Nazario JA
    J Water Health; 2016 Oct; 14(5):796-807. PubMed ID: 27740545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Climate relationships to fecal bacterial densities in Maryland shellfish harvest waters.
    Leight AK; Hood R; Wood R; Brohawn K
    Water Res; 2016 Feb; 89():270-81. PubMed ID: 26689664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of the climate change impacts on fecal coliform contamination in a tidal estuarine system.
    Liu WC; Chan WT
    Environ Monit Assess; 2015 Dec; 187(12):728. PubMed ID: 26545372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microbiological aspects of an urban river used for unrestricted irrigation in the semi-arid region of north-east Brazil.
    Ceballos BS; Soares NE; Moraes MR; Catão RM; Konig A
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(3):51-7. PubMed ID: 12639005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Coliform pollution mapping in major watersheds along Jhelum River Basin of Kashmir Himalaya.
    Qayoom U; Islam ST; Sabha I; Bhat SU; Dar SA
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jan; 30(3):7930-7941. PubMed ID: 36048395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.