These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16770592)

  • 1. Biogas production from crop residues on a farm-scale level in Sweden: scale, choice of substrate and utilisation rate most important parameters for financial feasibility.
    Svensson LM; Christensson K; Björnsson L
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2006 Jul; 29(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 16770592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biogas production from crop residues on a farm-scale level: is it economically feasible under conditions in Sweden?
    Svensson LM; Christensson K; Björnsson L
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2005 Dec; 28(3):139-48. PubMed ID: 16172872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Substituting energy crops with organic wastes and agro-industrial residues for biogas production.
    Schievano A; D'Imporzano G; Adani F
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jun; 90(8):2537-41. PubMed ID: 19254824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biogas from energy crops--optimal pre-treatments and storage, co-digestion and energy balance in boreal conditions.
    Seppälä M; Paavola T; Lehtomäki A; Pakarinen O; Rintala J
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(9):1857-63. PubMed ID: 19029729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Co-digestion of energy crops and the source-sorted organic fraction of municipal solid waste.
    Nordberg A; Edström M
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(1-2):217-22. PubMed ID: 16180431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of increasing energy crop addition on process performance and residual methane potential in anaerobic digestion.
    Lindorfer H; Pérez López C; Resch C; Braun R; Kirchmayr R
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(10):55-63. PubMed ID: 18048977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two-stage anaerobic digestion of energy crops: methane production, nitrogen mineralisation and heavy metal mobilisation.
    Lehtomäki A; Björnsson L
    Environ Technol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 16506517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methane production through anaerobic digestion of various energy crops grown in sustainable crop rotations.
    Amon T; Amon B; Kryvoruchko V; Machmüller A; Hopfner-Sixt K; Bodiroza V; Hrbek R; Friedel J; Pötsch E; Wagentristl H; Schreiner M; Zollitsch W
    Bioresour Technol; 2007 Dec; 98(17):3204-12. PubMed ID: 16935493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Production costs and operative margins in electric energy generation from biogas. Full-scale case studies in Italy.
    Riva C; Schievano A; D'Imporzano G; Adani F
    Waste Manag; 2014 Aug; 34(8):1429-35. PubMed ID: 24841069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The valuation of malnutrition in the mono-digestion of maize silage by anaerobic batch tests.
    Hinken L; Urban I; Haun E; Urban I; Weichgrebe D; Rosenwinkel KH
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(7):1453-9. PubMed ID: 18957759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Foodwaste as a co-substrate in a fed-batch anaerobic biowaste digester for constant biogas supply.
    Nayono SE; Gallert C; Winter J
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(6):1169-78. PubMed ID: 19342813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biogas production from different substrates in an experimental Continuously Stirred Tank Reactor anaerobic digester.
    Fantozzi F; Buratti C
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Dec; 100(23):5783-9. PubMed ID: 19595588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biogas from sugar beet press pulp as substitute of fossil fuel in sugar beet factories.
    Brooks L; Parravicini V; Svardal K; Kroiss H; Prendl L
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(7):1497-504. PubMed ID: 18957765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Operational results of an agricultural biogas plant equipped with modern instrumentation and automation.
    Wiese J; Kujawski O
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(6):803-8. PubMed ID: 18413937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of energy crop substrates on the mass-flow analysis and the residual methane potential at a rural anaerobic digestion plant.
    Resch C; Braun R; Kirchmayr R
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 18192743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The potential of bio-methane as bio-fuel/bio-energy for reducing greenhouse gas emissions: a qualitative assessment for Europe in a life cycle perspective.
    Tilche A; Galatola M
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(11):1683-92. PubMed ID: 18547917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Doubling the organic loading rate in the co-digestion of energy crops and manure--a full scale case study.
    Lindorfer H; Corcoba A; Vasilieva V; Braun R; Kirchmayr R
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Mar; 99(5):1148-56. PubMed ID: 17449245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modelling the energy balance of an anaerobic digester fed with cattle manure and renewable energy crops.
    Lübken M; Wichern M; Schlattmann M; Gronauer A; Horn H
    Water Res; 2007 Oct; 41(18):4085-96. PubMed ID: 17631938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wet explosion of wheat straw and codigestion with swine manure: effect on the methane productivity.
    Wang G; Gavala HN; Skiadas IV; Ahring BK
    Waste Manag; 2009 Nov; 29(11):2830-5. PubMed ID: 19666217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detailed monitoring of two biogas plants and mechanical solid-liquid separation of fermentation residues.
    Bauer A; Mayr H; Hopfner-Sixt K; Amon T
    J Biotechnol; 2009 Jun; 142(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 19480948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.