135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16770878)
1. Restricted treatments, inducements, and research participation.
Edwards SJ
Bioethics; 2006 Apr; 20(2):77-91. PubMed ID: 16770878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. For-profit clinical trials in developing countries--those troublesome patient benefits.
Schuklenk U
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):52-4. PubMed ID: 20526975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Research participation and financial inducements.
Todd C
Am J Bioeth; 2001; 1(2):60-1. PubMed ID: 11951897
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Social justice, federal paternalism, and feminism: breast implants in the cultural context of female beauty.
Parker LS
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1993 Mar; 3(1):57-76. PubMed ID: 11645225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An ethical framework for the practice of paying research subjects.
Ackerman TF
IRB; 1989; 11(4):1-4. PubMed ID: 11650243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Drug-testing on seropositive pregnant women in the developing world: moral and legal implications.
Mayss A
Med Law Int; 2000; 4(3-4):183-210. PubMed ID: 15040361
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Bioethics, vulnerability, and protection.
Macklin R
Bioethics; 2003 Oct; 17(5-6):472-86. PubMed ID: 14959716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On paying money to research subjects: 'due' and 'undue' inducements.
Macklin R
IRB; 1981 May; 3(5):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Paying people to participate in research: why not? A response to Wilkinson and Moore.
McNeill P
Bioethics; 1997 Oct; 11(5):390-6. PubMed ID: 11655118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Justifying a principle of informed consent: a case study in autonomy-based ethics.
Gunderson M
Public Aff Q; 1990 Jul; 4(3):249-65. PubMed ID: 11659297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. AIDS and the FDA: an ethical case for limiting patient access to new medical therapies.
Shorr AF
IRB; 1992; 14(4):1-5. PubMed ID: 11651391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Women's and fetal rights and interests: ethical aspects.
Fletcher JC
Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 11653145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Regulation of drug treatments for HIV and AIDS: a contractarian model of access.
Salbu SR
Yale J Regul; 1994; 11(2):401-53. PubMed ID: 11660141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Guinea pigs on the payroll: the ethics of paying research subjects.
Lemmens T; Elliott C
Account Res; 1999; 7(1):3-20. PubMed ID: 11657561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Human experimentation in developing countries: improving international practices by identifying vulnerable populations and allocating fair benefits.
Farrell K
J Health Care Law Policy; 2006; 9(1):136-61. PubMed ID: 17165228
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Counting the dragon's teeth and claws: the definition of hard paternalism.
Pope TM
Ga State Univ Law Rev; 2004; 20(3):659-722. PubMed ID: 16180296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The perverse consequences of a proposed global tax on research.
MacDonald C; Walton N
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):46-7. PubMed ID: 20526972
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Ethics of research: the freedom to withdraw].
de Cenival M
Bull Soc Pathol Exot; 2008 Apr; 101(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 18543700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inducement in research.
Wilkinson M; Moore A
Bioethics; 1997 Oct; 11(5):373-89. PubMed ID: 11655117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
American Society of Clinical Oncology
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
