These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1677154)

  • 1. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-parsimony and distance-matrix methods of phylogeny construction for restriction data.
    Lin J; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1991 May; 8(3):356-65. PubMed ID: 1677154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relative efficiencies of the maximum parsimony and distance-matrix methods in obtaining the correct phylogenetic tree.
    Sourdis J; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1988 May; 5(3):298-311. PubMed ID: 3386530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-likelihood, neighbor-joining, and maximum-parsimony methods when substitution rate varies with site.
    Tateno Y; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):261-77. PubMed ID: 8170367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficiencies of different genes and different tree-building methods in recovering a known vertebrate phylogeny.
    Russo CA; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1996 Mar; 13(3):525-36. PubMed ID: 8742641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of phylogenetic trees estimated from DNA sequence data.
    Sourdis J; Krimbas C
    Mol Biol Evol; 1987 Mar; 4(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 3447006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relative efficiencies of the maximum likelihood, maximum parsimony, and neighbor-joining methods for estimating protein phylogeny.
    Hasegawa M; Fujiwara M
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 1993 Mar; 2(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 8081543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficiencies of fast algorithms of phylogenetic inference under the criteria of maximum parsimony, minimum evolution, and maximum likelihood when a large number of sequences are used.
    Takahashi K; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2000 Aug; 17(8):1251-8. PubMed ID: 10908645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. II. Gene frequency data.
    Nei M; Tajima F; Tateno Y
    J Mol Evol; 1983; 19(2):153-70. PubMed ID: 6571220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating the relationship between evolutionary divergence and phylogenetic accuracy in AFLP data sets.
    García-Pereira MJ; Caballero A; Quesada H
    Mol Biol Evol; 2010 May; 27(5):988-1000. PubMed ID: 20026482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Limitations of the evolutionary parsimony method of phylogenetic analysis.
    Jin L; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1990 Jan; 7(1):82-102. PubMed ID: 2299983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficiencies of the NJp, Maximum Likelihood, and Bayesian Methods of Phylogenetic Construction for Compositional and Noncompositional Genes.
    Yoshida R; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Jun; 33(6):1618-24. PubMed ID: 26929244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A computer simulation analysis of the accuracy of partial genome sequencing and restriction fragment analysis in the reconstruction of phylogenetic relationships.
    Qiao B; Goldberg TL; Olsen GJ; Weigel RM
    Infect Genet Evol; 2006 Jul; 6(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 16406823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and likelihood methods.
    Yang Z
    J Mol Evol; 1996 Feb; 42(2):294-307. PubMed ID: 8919881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. I. Distantly related species.
    Tateno Y; Nei M; Tajima F
    J Mol Evol; 1982; 18(6):387-404. PubMed ID: 7175956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of sequence length, tree topology, and number of taxa on the performance of phylogenetic methods.
    Charleston MA; Hendy MD; Penny D
    J Comput Biol; 1994; 1(2):133-51. PubMed ID: 8790460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nucleotide substitution models and estimation of phylogeny.
    Håstad O; Björklund M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1998 Nov; 15(11):1381-9. PubMed ID: 12572602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. THE ACCURACY OF PHYLOGENETIC ESTIMATION USING THE NEIGHBOR-JOINING METHOD.
    Kim J; Rohlf FJ; Sokal RR
    Evolution; 1993 Apr; 47(2):471-486. PubMed ID: 28568714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A simulation comparison of phylogeny algorithms under equal and unequal evolutionary rates.
    Kuhner MK; Felsenstein J
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 May; 11(3):459-68. PubMed ID: 8015439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maximum parsimony, substitution model, and probability phylogenetic trees.
    Weng JF; Thomas DA; Mareels I
    J Comput Biol; 2011 Jan; 18(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 20624099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Property and efficiency of the maximum likelihood method for molecular phylogeny.
    Saitou N
    J Mol Evol; 1988; 27(3):261-73. PubMed ID: 3138428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.