These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1677154)

  • 41. Reanalysis of Murphy et al.'s data gives various mammalian phylogenies and suggests overcredibility of Bayesian trees.
    Misawa K; Nei M
    J Mol Evol; 2003; 57 Suppl 1():S290-6. PubMed ID: 15008427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Theoretical foundation to estimate the relative efficiencies of the Jukes-Cantor+gamma model and the Jukes-Cantor model in obtaining the correct phylogenetic tree.
    Som A
    Gene; 2006 Dec; 385():103-10. PubMed ID: 16979305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Bayesian coestimation of phylogeny and sequence alignment.
    Lunter G; Miklós I; Drummond A; Jensen JL; Hein J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():83. PubMed ID: 15804354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The effects of nucleotide substitution model assumptions on estimates of nonparametric bootstrap support.
    Buckley TR; Cunningham CW
    Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Apr; 19(4):394-405. PubMed ID: 11919280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparison of models for nucleotide substitution used in maximum-likelihood phylogenetic estimation.
    Yang Z; Goldman N; Friday A
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):316-24. PubMed ID: 8170371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Getting a tree fast: Neighbor Joining, FastME, and distance-based methods.
    Desper R; Gascuel O
    Curr Protoc Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; Chapter 6():Unit 6.3. PubMed ID: 18428768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Performance of maximum parsimony and likelihood phylogenetics when evolution is heterogeneous.
    Kolaczkowski B; Thornton JW
    Nature; 2004 Oct; 431(7011):980-4. PubMed ID: 15496922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. When does the incongruence length difference test fail?
    Darlu P; Lecointre G
    Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Apr; 19(4):432-7. PubMed ID: 11919284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The effect of heterotachy in multigene analysis using the neighbor joining method.
    Som A; Fuellen G
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2009 Sep; 52(3):846-51. PubMed ID: 19482090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of the accuracies of several phylogenetic methods using protein and DNA sequences.
    Hall BG
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Mar; 22(3):792-802. PubMed ID: 15590907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Phylogenetic relationships of Russian far eastern flatfish (Pleuronectiformes, Pleuronectidae) based on two mitochondrial gene sequences, Co-1 and Cyt-b, with inferences in order phylogeny using complete mitogenome data.
    Kartavtsev YP; Sharina SN; Saitoh K; Imoto JM; Hanzawa N; Redin AD
    Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal; 2016; 27(1):667-78. PubMed ID: 24841433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Rhoptry protein 47 gene sequence: A potential novel genetic marker for population genetic studies of Toxoplasma gondii.
    Wang JL; Li TT; Li ZY; Huang SY; Ning HR; Zhu XQ
    Exp Parasitol; 2015 Jul; 154():1-4. PubMed ID: 25862398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A multi-neighbor-joining approach for phylogenetic tree reconstruction and visualization.
    Silva AE; Villanueva WJ; Knidel H; Bonato VC; Reis SF; Von Zuben FJ
    Genet Mol Res; 2005 Sep; 4(3):525-34. PubMed ID: 16342037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Estimation of evolutionary distance for reconstructing molecular phylogenetic trees.
    Tajima F; Takezaki N
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):278-86. PubMed ID: 8170368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Accuracy guarantees for phylogeny reconstruction algorithms based on balanced minimum evolution.
    Bordewich M; Mihaescu R
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2013; 10(3):576-83. PubMed ID: 24091392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Biases of the estimates of DNA divergence obtained by the restriction enzyme technique.
    Tajima F; Nei M
    J Mol Evol; 1982; 18(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 6284946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Efficient biased estimation of evolutionary distances when substitution rates vary across sites.
    Guindon S; Gascuel O
    Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Apr; 19(4):534-43. PubMed ID: 11919295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of Boolean analysis and standard phylogenetic methods using artificially evolved and natural mt-tRNA sequences from great apes.
    Ari E; Ittzés P; Podani J; Thi QC; Jakó E
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2012 Apr; 63(1):193-202. PubMed ID: 22289866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Robustness of maximum likelihood tree estimation against different patterns of base substitutions.
    Fukami-Kobayashi K; Tateno Y
    J Mol Evol; 1991 Jan; 32(1):79-91. PubMed ID: 1849180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluating intraspecific "network" construction methods using simulated sequence data: do existing algorithms outperform the global maximum parsimony approach?
    Cassens I; Mardulyn P; Milinkovitch MC
    Syst Biol; 2005 Jun; 54(3):363-72. PubMed ID: 16012104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.