BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16772260)

  • 1. Normalization and quantification of differential expression in gene expression microarrays.
    Steinhoff C; Vingron M
    Brief Bioinform; 2006 Jun; 7(2):166-77. PubMed ID: 16772260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Model selection and efficiency testing for normalization of cDNA microarray data.
    Futschik M; Crompton T
    Genome Biol; 2004; 5(8):R60. PubMed ID: 15287982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Issues in cDNA microarray analysis: quality filtering, channel normalization, models of variations and assessment of gene effects.
    Tseng GC; Oh MK; Rohlin L; Liao JC; Wong WH
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2001 Jun; 29(12):2549-57. PubMed ID: 11410663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CLUSFAVOR 5.0: hierarchical cluster and principal-component analysis of microarray-based transcriptional profiles.
    Peterson LE
    Genome Biol; 2002 Jun; 3(7):SOFTWARE0002. PubMed ID: 12184816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. DGEclust: differential expression analysis of clustered count data.
    Vavoulis DV; Francescatto M; Heutink P; Gough J
    Genome Biol; 2015 Feb; 16(1):39. PubMed ID: 25853652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical challenges in preprocessing in microarray experiments in cancer.
    Owzar K; Barry WT; Jung SH; Sohn I; George SL
    Clin Cancer Res; 2008 Oct; 14(19):5959-66. PubMed ID: 18829474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Making a new technology work: the standardization and regulation of microarrays.
    Rogers S; Cambrosio A
    Yale J Biol Med; 2007 Dec; 80(4):165-78. PubMed ID: 18449388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality assurance of RNA expression profiling in clinical laboratories.
    Tang W; Hu Z; Muallem H; Gulley ML
    J Mol Diagn; 2012 Jan; 14(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 22020152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison and evaluation of methods for generating differentially expressed gene lists from microarray data.
    Jeffery IB; Higgins DG; Culhane AC
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 7():359. PubMed ID: 16872483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pre-processing of microarray data and analysis of differential expression.
    Durinck S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 452():89-110. PubMed ID: 18563370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role and robustness of the Gini coefficient as an unbiased tool for the selection of Gini genes for normalising expression profiling data.
    Wright Muelas M; Mughal F; O'Hagan S; Day PJ; Kell DB
    Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):17960. PubMed ID: 31784565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of drug-targetable genes by defining modes of abnormality in gene expression.
    Park J; Lee J; Choi C
    Sci Rep; 2015 Sep; 5():13576. PubMed ID: 26336805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of subsampling on characteristics of RNA-seq data from triple-negative breast cancer patients.
    Stupnikov A; Glazko GV; Emmert-Streib F
    Chin J Cancer; 2015 Aug; 34(10):427-38. PubMed ID: 26253000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gene expression profiling leads to discovery of correlation of matrix metalloproteinase 11 and heparanase 2 in breast cancer progression.
    Fu J; Khaybullin R; Zhang Y; Xia A; Qi X
    BMC Cancer; 2015 Jun; 15():473. PubMed ID: 26084486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identification of Biomarkers in Breast Cancer by Gene Expression Profiling Using Human Tissues.
    Fu J; Allen W; Xia A; Ma Z; Qi X
    Genom Data; 2014 Dec; 2():299-301. PubMed ID: 25396118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hybrid method for prediction of metastasis in breast cancer patients using gene expression signals.
    Dehnavi AM; Sehhati MR; Rabbani H
    J Med Signals Sens; 2013 Apr; 3(2):79-86. PubMed ID: 24098861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of the experimental design of gene expression studies on the inference of gene regulatory networks: environmental factors.
    Emmert-Streib F
    PeerJ; 2013; 1():e10. PubMed ID: 23638344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of statistical estimators of mutual information and data heterogeneity on the inference of gene regulatory networks.
    de Matos Simoes R; Emmert-Streib F
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e29279. PubMed ID: 22242113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. RegnANN: Reverse Engineering Gene Networks using Artificial Neural Networks.
    Grimaldi M; Visintainer R; Jurman G
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e28646. PubMed ID: 22216103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gene set enrichment analysis: performance evaluation and usage guidelines.
    Hung JH; Yang TH; Hu Z; Weng Z; DeLisi C
    Brief Bioinform; 2012 May; 13(3):281-91. PubMed ID: 21900207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.