These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16772987)

  • 1. Augmentation mammaplasty: asymmetrical lowering of breast fold.
    Pacik PT
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Jun; 117(7):2523-4. PubMed ID: 16772987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correction of breast asymmetries with implants.
    Zayakova Y
    Khirurgiia (Sofiia); 2013; (1):12-7. PubMed ID: 23847805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 3D analysis of breast augmentation defines operative changes and their relationship to implant dimensions.
    Tepper OM; Small KH; Unger JG; Feldman DL; Kumar N; Choi M; Karp NS
    Ann Plast Surg; 2009 May; 62(5):570-5. PubMed ID: 19387164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Key points in mastopexy.
    De Benito J; Sánchez K
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2010 Dec; 34(6):711-5. PubMed ID: 20499062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional evaluation of breast augmentation and the influence of anatomic and round implants on operative breast shape changes.
    Kovacs L; Eder M; Zimmermann A; Müller D; Schuster T; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E; Klöppel M; Machens HG
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):879-87. PubMed ID: 22535137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combined Use of Implant and Fat Grafting for Breast Augmentation.
    Auclair E; Anavekar N
    Clin Plast Surg; 2015 Jul; 42(3):307-14, vii. PubMed ID: 26116936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Augmentation/mastopexy: how to select and perform the proper technique.
    Cárdenas-Camarena L; Ramírez-Macías R; ; ; ; ; ;
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2006; 30(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 16404648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Augmentation-mastopexy using an autologous parenchymal sling.
    Steinbacher DM; Singh N; Katz R; Khalifeh M
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2010 Oct; 34(5):664-71. PubMed ID: 20419301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Magnetic resonance tomography in the diagnostics of breast implants: a survey].
    Hauth EA; Hoffmann O; Zadow-Eulerich T; Kimmig R; Forsting M
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2008; 48(2):76-83. PubMed ID: 18431047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Breast augmentation by implants: a review of surgical practices. A study among French plastic surgeons].
    Chekaroua K; Delay E
    Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2005 Oct; 50(5):673-84. PubMed ID: 16185808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aesthetic breast surgery: emerging trends and technologies.
    Lund HG; Kumpf AL
    Mo Med; 2010; 107(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 20629290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The history and development of breast implants.
    Perry D; Frame JD
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2020 Sep; 102(7):478-482. PubMed ID: 31964154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Planning augmentation mammaplasty of breast asymmetries.
    Zayakova Y
    Khirurgiia (Sofiia); 2013; (2):20-5. PubMed ID: 24151746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Asymmetric implants for breast asymmetry.
    Mallucci P; Branford OA
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Nov; 65(11):1580-3. PubMed ID: 22542729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The primary mammoplasty in patients with breast cancer].
    Shapoval EV
    Khirurgiia (Mosk); 2011; (12):29-32. PubMed ID: 22433521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Primary breast augmentation clinical trial outcomes stratified by surgical incision, anatomical placement and implant device type.
    Namnoum JD; Largent J; Kaplan HM; Oefelein MG; Brown MH
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Sep; 66(9):1165-72. PubMed ID: 23664574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transaxillary totally subfascial breast augmentation with anatomical breast implants: review of 27 cases.
    Salgarello M; Visconti G
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Feb; 133(2):220e-222e. PubMed ID: 24469196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discussion: prospective comparative clinical evaluation of 784 consecutive cases of breast augmentation and vertical mammaplasty, performed individually and in combination.
    Hidalgo DA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Jul; 132(1):46e-47e. PubMed ID: 23806953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maximizing the use of precapsular space and the choice of implant type in breast augmentation mammaplasty revisions: review of 49 consecutive procedures and patient satisfaction assessment.
    Castello MF; Lazzeri D; Silvestri A; Agostini T; Pascone C; Marcelli C; Gigliotti D; D'Aniello C; Gasparotti M
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Oct; 35(5):828-38. PubMed ID: 21455821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nipple-areola complex sensitivity after primary breast augmentation: a comparison of periareolar and inframammary incision approaches.
    Mofid MM; Klatsky SA; Singh NK; Nahabedian MY
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 May; 117(6):1694-8. PubMed ID: 16651938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.