106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16774181)
1. Small size ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: predictors of positive margins after local excision.
de Roos MA; Groote AD; Pijnappel RM; Post WJ; de Vries J; Baas PC
Int Surg; 2006; 91(2):100-6. PubMed ID: 16774181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictive value of extent and grade of ductal carcinoma in situ in radiologically guided core biopsy for the status of margins in lumpectomy specimens.
Mai KT; Yazdi HM; Ford JC; Matzinger FR
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2000 Nov; 26(7):646-51. PubMed ID: 11078610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ductal carcinoma in situ. The success of breast conservation therapy: a shared experience of two single institutional nonrandomized prospective studies.
Lagios MD; Silverstein MJ
Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 1997 Apr; 6(2):385-92. PubMed ID: 9115503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does the volume of ductal carcinoma in situ impact the positive margin rate in patients undergoing breast conservation for invasive breast cancer?
Martin-Dunlap TM; Cyr AE; Al Mushawah F; Gao F; Margenthaler JA
J Surg Res; 2013 Sep; 184(1):228-33. PubMed ID: 23688789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship between the size and margin status of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast and residual disease.
Cheng L; Al-Kaisi NK; Gordon NH; Liu AY; Gebrail F; Shenk RR
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Sep; 89(18):1356-60. PubMed ID: 9308705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Recurrence rates and analysis of close or positive margins in patients treated without re-excision before radiation for breast cancer.
McIntosh A; Freedman G; Eisenberg D; Anderson P
Am J Clin Oncol; 2007 Apr; 30(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 17414463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy.
Balch GC; Mithani SK; Simpson JF; Kelley MC
Am Surg; 2005 Jan; 71(1):22-7; discussion 27-8. PubMed ID: 15757052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast screening program.
Kurniawan ED; Wong MH; Windle I; Rose A; Mou A; Buchanan M; Collins JP; Miller JA; Gruen RL; Mann GB
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):2542-9. PubMed ID: 18618180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are We Overtreating Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS)?
Khan S; Epstein M; Lagios MD; Silverstein MJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 27527719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Non-menopausal Status, High Nuclear Grade, Tumor Size >30 mm and Positive Resection Margins Are Predictors of Residual Tumor After Lumpectomy for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast.
Joste M; Mendes V; Tixier S; Palpacuer C; Laviolle B; Leveque J; Ouldamer L
Anticancer Res; 2015 Jun; 35(6):3471-7. PubMed ID: 26026112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Retrospective analysis of 108 ductal carcinomas in situ of the breast treated by radiosurgery association].
Fourneret P; Artignan X; De Cornulier J; Pasquier D; Panh MH; Payan R; Kolodié H; Vincent F; Fric D; Bernard P; Colona M; Bolla M
Cancer Radiother; 2006 Dec; 10(8):550-8. PubMed ID: 16890006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors affecting successful breast conservation for ductal carcinoma in situ.
Dillon MF; Mc Dermott EW; O'Doherty A; Quinn CM; Hill AD; O'Higgins N
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 May; 14(5):1618-28. PubMed ID: 17443388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictors of positive margins after local excision of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Mokbel K; Choy C; Leris C; Akbar M; Vinnicombe S; Kessar P; Perry N; Wells C; Carpenter R
Am J Surg; 2001 Feb; 181(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 11425066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 259 Patients with DCIS of the breast applying USC/Van Nuys prognostic index: a retrospective review with long term follow up.
Di Saverio S; Catena F; Santini D; Ansaloni L; Fogacci T; Mignani S; Leone A; Gazzotti F; Gagliardi S; De Cataldis A; Taffurelli M
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Jun; 109(3):405-16. PubMed ID: 17687650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammographic bi-dimensional product: a powerful predictor of successful excision of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Evans A; Clements K; Maxwell A; Dobson H; Wallis M; Lawrence G; Bishop H; Sloane Project Steering Group
Clin Radiol; 2007 Aug; 62(8):787-91. PubMed ID: 17604769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The relationship between shaved margin and inked margin status in breast excision specimens.
Guidi AJ; Connolly JL; Harris JR; Schnitt SJ
Cancer; 1997 Apr; 79(8):1568-73. PubMed ID: 9118040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictors of local recurrence following excision alone for ductal carcinoma in situ.
Hetelekidis S; Collins L; Silver B; Manola J; Gelman R; Cooper A; Lester S; Lyons JA; Harris JR; Schnitt SJ
Cancer; 1999 Jan; 85(2):427-31. PubMed ID: 10023711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Value of the Van Nuys Prognostic Index in prediction of recurrence of ductal carcinoma in situ after breast-conserving surgery.
Boland GP; Chan KC; Knox WF; Roberts SA; Bundred NJ
Br J Surg; 2003 Apr; 90(4):426-32. PubMed ID: 12673743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
Aziz D; Rawlinson E; Narod SA; Sun P; Lickley HL; McCready DR; Holloway CM
Breast J; 2006; 12(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 16848842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
