These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Innovative strategies using SUDAAN for analysis of health surveys with complex samples. LaVange LM; Stearns SC; Lafata JE; Koch GG; Shah BV Stat Methods Med Res; 1996 Sep; 5(3):311-29. PubMed ID: 8931198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Survey design in orthopaedic surgery: getting surgeons to respond. Sprague S; Quigley L; Bhandari M J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 May; 91 Suppl 3():27-34. PubMed ID: 19411497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Issues in nursing: strategies for an Internet-based, computer-assisted telephone survey. Piamjariyakul U; Bott MJ; Taunton RL West J Nurs Res; 2006 Aug; 28(5):602-9. PubMed ID: 16829640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A tool for software and hardware evaluation. Kokol P J Med Syst; 1996 Jun; 20(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 8798948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A primer on web surveys. Austin TM; Richter RR; Reinking MF J Allied Health; 2008; 37(3):180-6. PubMed ID: 18847116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Web-based survey of US health educators: challenges and lessons. Chen LS; Goodson P Am J Health Behav; 2010; 34(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 19663746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Online medical surveys: using the Internet as a research tool. Houston JD; Fiore DC MD Comput; 1998; 15(2):116-20. PubMed ID: 9540325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Internet surveys with adolescents: promising methods and methodologic challenges. Sutter E; Klein JD Adolesc Med State Art Rev; 2007 Aug; 18(2):293-304, x. PubMed ID: 18605647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Windows-based tool for the study of clinical decision-making. Mackel JV; Farris H; Mittman BS; Wilkes M; Kanouse DE Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 2():1687. PubMed ID: 8591547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Response audit of an Internet survey of health care providers and administrators: implications for determination of response rates. Dobrow MJ; Orchard MC; Golden B; Holowaty E; Paszat L; Brown AD; Sullivan T J Med Internet Res; 2008 Oct; 10(4):e30. PubMed ID: 18926979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analyzing qualitative data with computer software. Weitzman EA Health Serv Res; 1999 Dec; 34(5 Pt 2):1241-63. PubMed ID: 10591282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conducting Internet-based HIV/STD prevention survey research: considerations in design and evaluation. Pequegnat W; Rosser BR; Bowen AM; Bull SS; DiClemente RJ; Bockting WO; Elford J; Fishbein M; Gurak L; Horvath K; Konstan J; Noar SM; Ross MW; Sherr L; Spiegel D; Zimmerman R AIDS Behav; 2007 Jul; 11(4):505-21. PubMed ID: 17053853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Why are people downloading the freeware AIDA diabetes computing software program: a pilot study. Lehmann ED Diabetes Technol Ther; 2002; 4(6):793-808. PubMed ID: 12685803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A microprocessor revolution in data collection? Feeney G Asian Pac Cens Forum; 1983 Aug; 10(1):1, 13. PubMed ID: 12265686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Developing the online survey. Gordon JS; McNew R Nurs Clin North Am; 2008 Dec; 43(4):605-19, vii. PubMed ID: 18940417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of report cards on employees: a natural experiment. Knutson DJ; Kind EA; Fowles JB; Adlis S Health Care Financ Rev; 1998; 20(1):5-27. PubMed ID: 10387425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]