996 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16776407)
1. Injection pain of prilocaine plain, mepivacaine plain, articaine with epinephrine, and lidocaine with epinephrine.
Wahl MJ; Schmitt MM; Overton DA
Gen Dent; 2006; 54(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 16776407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of injection pain with articaine with adrenaline, prilocaine with phenylpressin and lidocaine with adrenaline.
Sumer M; Misir F; Celebi N; Muğlali M
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2008 Jul; 13(7):E427-30. PubMed ID: 18587306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Injection pain of bupivacaine with epinephrine vs. prilocaine plain.
Wahl MJ; Schmitt MM; Overton DA; Gordon MK
J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Dec; 133(12):1652-6. PubMed ID: 12512665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Articaine buccal infiltration enhances the effectiveness of lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block.
Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Corbett IP; Meechan JG
Int Endod J; 2009 Mar; 42(3):238-46. PubMed ID: 19228214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical efficacy of lidocaine, mepivacaine, and articaine for local infiltration.
Srisurang S; Narit L; Prisana P
J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 25427324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine when used as a supplemental anesthetic.
Rosenberg PA; Amin KG; Zibari Y; Lin LM
J Endod; 2007 Apr; 33(4):403-5. PubMed ID: 17368327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anesthetic comparisons of 4% concentrations of articaine, lidocaine, and prilocaine as primary buccal infiltrations of the mandibular first molar: a prospective randomized, double-blind study.
Nydegger B; Nusstein J; Reader A; Drum M; Beck M
J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):1912-6. PubMed ID: 25218523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does the combination of 3% mepivacaine plain plus 2% lidocaine with epinephrine improve anesthesia and reduce the pain of anesthetic injection for the inferior alveolar nerve block? A prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
Lammers E; Nusstein J; Reader A; Drum M; Beck M; Fowler S
J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1287-92. PubMed ID: 25146009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of prilocaine for the reduction of pain associated with transmucosal anesthetic administration.
Kramp LF; Eleazer PD; Scheetz JP
Anesth Prog; 1999; 46(2):52-5. PubMed ID: 10853565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective randomized trial of different supplementary local anesthetic techniques after failure of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis in mandibular teeth.
Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Meechan JG
J Endod; 2012 Apr; 38(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 22414822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pain on injection of prilocaine plain vs. lidocaine with epinephrine. A prospective double-blind study.
Wahl MJ; Overton D; Howell J; Siegel E; Schmitt MM; Muldoon M
J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Oct; 132(10):1396-401; quiz 1460. PubMed ID: 11680354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of intraoral injection discomfort produced by plain and epinephrine-containing lidocaine local anesthetic solutions: a randomized, double-blind, split-mouth, volunteer investigation.
Meechan JG; Day PF
Anesth Prog; 2002; 49(2):44-8. PubMed ID: 15384291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine in achieving pulpal anesthesia in maxillary teeth with irreversible pulpitis.
Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Meechan JG
J Endod; 2012 Mar; 38(3):279-82. PubMed ID: 22341059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anesthetic efficacy of supplemental buccal and lingual infiltrations of articaine and lidocaine after an inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis.
Aggarwal V; Jain A; Kabi D
J Endod; 2009 Jul; 35(7):925-9. PubMed ID: 19567309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anesthetic efficacy of articaine and lidocaine for incisive/mental nerve block.
Batista da Silva C; Berto LA; Volpato MC; Ramacciato JC; Motta RH; Ranali J; Groppo FC
J Endod; 2010 Mar; 36(3):438-41. PubMed ID: 20171359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine in block and infiltration anesthesia administered in teeth with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
Ashraf H; Kazem M; Dianat O; Noghrehkar F
J Endod; 2013 Jan; 39(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 23228249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Injection pain and postinjection pain of the palatal-anterior superior alveolar injection, administered with the Wand Plus system, comparing 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine to 3% mepivacaine.
Nusstein J; Burns Y; Reader A; Beck M; Weaver J
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Feb; 97(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 14970775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of injection pain, heart rate increase, and postinjection pain of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.
Nusstein J; Berlin J; Reader A; Beck M; Weaver JM
Anesth Prog; 2004; 51(4):126-33. PubMed ID: 15675261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of Two Different Anesthetic Solutions on Injection Pain, Efficacy, and Duration of Soft-Tissue Anesthesia with Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block for Primary Molars.
Elbay ÜŞ; Elbay M; Kaya E; Yıldırım S
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(6):456-463. PubMed ID: 27805885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anesthetic efficacy of four percent articaine for pulpal anesthesia by using inferior alveolar nerve block and buccal infiltration techniques in patients with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial.
Poorni S; Veniashok B; Senthilkumar AD; Indira R; Ramachandran S
J Endod; 2011 Dec; 37(12):1603-7. PubMed ID: 22099890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
