182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16776408)
1. Composite resin restorations of large class II cavities using split-increment horizontal placement technique.
Hassan K; Khier S
Gen Dent; 2006; 54(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 16776408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Split increment horizontal layering: a simplified placement technique for direct posterior resin restorations.
Hassan K; Khier S
Gen Dent; 2005; 53(6):406-9. PubMed ID: 16366047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
van Dijken JW
J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities.
van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P; Waern R
Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 10388370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Managing stress with composite resin, Part 1: The restorative-tooth interface.
Terry DA; Leinfelder KF
Dent Today; 2006 Dec; 25(12):98, 100-4; quiz 104. PubMed ID: 17193798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Flowable materials as an intermediate layer could improve the marginal and internal adaptation of composite restorations in Class-V-cavities.
Li Q; Jepsen S; Albers HK; Eberhard J
Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):250-7. PubMed ID: 16084584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nanohybrid composite vs. fine hybrid composite in extended class II cavities: clinical and microscopic results after 2 years.
Krämer N; Reinelt C; García-Godoy F; Taschner M; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
Am J Dent; 2009 Aug; 22(4):228-34. PubMed ID: 19824560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization".
Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Märkl A
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 11203787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 36-month clinical evaluation of two adhesives and microhybrid resin composites in Class I restorations.
Swift EJ; Ritter AV; Heymann HO; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD
Am J Dent; 2008 Jun; 21(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 18686764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Achieving form and function for Class II restorations using aesthetic resin stratification.
Shannon AT
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 18(5):323-8. PubMed ID: 16903545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An in vitro comparison of metal and transparent matrices used for bonded class II resin composite restorations.
Müllejans R; Badawi MO; Raab WH; Lang H
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 12670066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On the effect of an internal light conductor on the marginal integrity of class-II composite fillings.
Stoll R; Gente M; Palichleb M; Stachniss V
Dent Mater; 2007 Feb; 23(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 16519928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations.
Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A
Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. SEM evaluation of marginal sealing on composite restorations using different photoactivation and composite insertion methods.
Lopes MB; Costa LA; Consani S; Gonini AJ; Sinhoreti MA
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 20139558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Direct posterior resin composite restorations: new techniques and clinical possibilities. Case reports.
Lopes GC; Ferreira Rde S; Baratieri LN; Vieira LC; Monteiro JS
Quintessence Int; 2002 May; 33(5):337-46. PubMed ID: 12014162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Class II direct composite resin restorations with beta-quartz glass-ceramic inserts.
Rada RE
Quintessence Int; 1993 Nov; 24(11):793-8. PubMed ID: 20830892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Marginal and internal adaptation of class II restorations after immediate or delayed composite placement.
Dietschi D; Monasevic M; Krejci I; Davidson C
J Dent; 2002; 30(5-6):259-69. PubMed ID: 12450717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Resin pins: a novel composite resin concept for treatment of posterior teeth--technical presentation.
de Almeida BC; de Almeida RS
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 20(8):507-11; quiz 512. PubMed ID: 18990903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
