These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16776408)

  • 1. Composite resin restorations of large class II cavities using split-increment horizontal placement technique.
    Hassan K; Khier S
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 16776408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Split increment horizontal layering: a simplified placement technique for direct posterior resin restorations.
    Hassan K; Khier S
    Gen Dent; 2005; 53(6):406-9. PubMed ID: 16366047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities.
    van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P; Waern R
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 10388370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Managing stress with composite resin, Part 1: The restorative-tooth interface.
    Terry DA; Leinfelder KF
    Dent Today; 2006 Dec; 25(12):98, 100-4; quiz 104. PubMed ID: 17193798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Flowable materials as an intermediate layer could improve the marginal and internal adaptation of composite restorations in Class-V-cavities.
    Li Q; Jepsen S; Albers HK; Eberhard J
    Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):250-7. PubMed ID: 16084584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nanohybrid composite vs. fine hybrid composite in extended class II cavities: clinical and microscopic results after 2 years.
    Krämer N; Reinelt C; García-Godoy F; Taschner M; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2009 Aug; 22(4):228-34. PubMed ID: 19824560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization".
    Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Märkl A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 11203787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 36-month clinical evaluation of two adhesives and microhybrid resin composites in Class I restorations.
    Swift EJ; Ritter AV; Heymann HO; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD
    Am J Dent; 2008 Jun; 21(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 18686764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Achieving form and function for Class II restorations using aesthetic resin stratification.
    Shannon AT
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 18(5):323-8. PubMed ID: 16903545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An in vitro comparison of metal and transparent matrices used for bonded class II resin composite restorations.
    Müllejans R; Badawi MO; Raab WH; Lang H
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 12670066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the effect of an internal light conductor on the marginal integrity of class-II composite fillings.
    Stoll R; Gente M; Palichleb M; Stachniss V
    Dent Mater; 2007 Feb; 23(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 16519928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations.
    Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. SEM evaluation of marginal sealing on composite restorations using different photoactivation and composite insertion methods.
    Lopes MB; Costa LA; Consani S; Gonini AJ; Sinhoreti MA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 20139558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Direct posterior resin composite restorations: new techniques and clinical possibilities. Case reports.
    Lopes GC; Ferreira Rde S; Baratieri LN; Vieira LC; Monteiro JS
    Quintessence Int; 2002 May; 33(5):337-46. PubMed ID: 12014162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Class II direct composite resin restorations with beta-quartz glass-ceramic inserts.
    Rada RE
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Nov; 24(11):793-8. PubMed ID: 20830892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal and internal adaptation of class II restorations after immediate or delayed composite placement.
    Dietschi D; Monasevic M; Krejci I; Davidson C
    J Dent; 2002; 30(5-6):259-69. PubMed ID: 12450717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Resin pins: a novel composite resin concept for treatment of posterior teeth--technical presentation.
    de Almeida BC; de Almeida RS
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 20(8):507-11; quiz 512. PubMed ID: 18990903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.