BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16777043)

  • 1. Disruption of order information by irrelevant items: a serial recognition paradigm.
    Gisselgård J; Uddén J; Ingvar M; Petersson KM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Mar; 124(3):356-69. PubMed ID: 16777043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detrimental effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall of visual items are reflected in reduced visual N1 and reduced theta activity.
    Weisz N; Schlittmeier SJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2006 Aug; 16(8):1097-105. PubMed ID: 16221927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Synchronized brain activity during rehearsal and short-term memory disruption by irrelevant speech is affected by recall mode.
    Kopp F; Schröger E; Lipka S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):188-203. PubMed ID: 16298003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disruption of verbal STM by irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and manual tapping: do they have a common source?
    Larsen JD; Baddeley A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1249-68. PubMed ID: 14578082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disruption of short-term memory by changing and deviant sounds: support for a duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction.
    Hughes RW; Vachon F; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1050-61. PubMed ID: 17983312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Phonological information in short-term memory of sentences].
    Rummer R; Schrobildgen M
    Z Exp Psychol; 2000; 47(2):144-54. PubMed ID: 10829617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can the irrelevant speech effect turn into a stimulus suffix effect?
    Schlittmeier SJ; Hellbrück J; Klatte M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 May; 61(5):665-73. PubMed ID: 18421641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory attentional capture during serial recall: violations at encoding of an algorithm-based neural model?
    Hughes RW; Vachon F; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):736-49. PubMed ID: 16060777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory memory and the irrelevant sound effect: Further evidence for changing-state disruption.
    Campbell T; Beaman CP; Berry DC
    Memory; 2002 May; 10(3):199-214. PubMed ID: 11958724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When does between-sequence phonological similarity promote irrelevant sound disruption?
    Marsh JE; Vachon F; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):243-8. PubMed ID: 18194067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does articulatory suppression remove the irrelevant speech effect?
    Hanley JR
    Memory; 1997 May; 5(3):423-31. PubMed ID: 9231151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Item and order memory for novel visual patterns assessed by two-choice recognition.
    Avons SE; Ward G; Melling L
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Jul; 57(5):865-91. PubMed ID: 15204121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Disruption of short-term memory by distractor speech: does content matter?
    Bell R; Mund I; Buchner A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jan; 64(1):146-68. PubMed ID: 20544562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What happens to information to be suppressed in working-memory tasks? Short and long term effects.
    Carretti B; Cornoldi C; De Beni R; Palladino P
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Aug; 57(6):1059-84. PubMed ID: 15370516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Direction of report in spatial and verbal serial short-term memory.
    Farrand P; Jones D
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1996 Feb; 49(1):140-58. PubMed ID: 8920100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of order incongruence between a task-irrelevant auditory sequence and a task-relevant visual sequence.
    Hughes RW; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Apr; 31(2):316-27. PubMed ID: 15826233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The item-order distinction and the generation effect: the importance of order information in long-term memory.
    Burns DJ
    Am J Psychol; 1996; 109(4):567-80. PubMed ID: 8989858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Irrelevant speech effects and statistical learning.
    Neath I; Guérard K; Jalbert A; Bireta TJ; Surprenant AM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Aug; 62(8):1551-9. PubMed ID: 19370483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Insensitivity of visual short-term memory to irrelevant visual information.
    Andrade J; Kemps E; Werniers Y; May J; Szmalec A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jul; 55(3):753-74. PubMed ID: 12188511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Serial order short-term memory capacities and specific language impairment: no evidence for a causal association.
    Majerus S; Leclercq AL; Grossmann A; Billard C; Touzin M; Van der Linden M; Poncelet M
    Cortex; 2009 Jun; 45(6):708-20. PubMed ID: 19084832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.