BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16777374)

  • 21. The challenge of reproductive and developmental toxicology under REACH.
    Scialli AR
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Jul; 51(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 18490093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Developmental toxicity testing of biopharmaceuticals in nonhuman primates: previous experience and future directions.
    Martin PL; Weinbauer GF
    Int J Toxicol; 2010 Dec; 29(6):552-68. PubMed ID: 20926830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Developmental neurotoxicity testing: recommendations for developing alternative methods for the screening and prioritization of chemicals.
    Crofton KM; Mundy WR; Lein PJ; Bal-Price A; Coecke S; Seiler AE; Knaut H; Buzanska L; Goldberg A
    ALTEX; 2011; 28(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 21311847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bromate: concern for developmental neurotoxicity?
    Crofton KM
    Toxicology; 2006 Apr; 221(2-3):212-6. PubMed ID: 16516369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Enhancement of developmental toxicity effects of chemicals by gestational stress. A review.
    Hougaard KS; Hansen AM
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2007; 29(4):425-45. PubMed ID: 17433620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Introduction to the EU REACH legislation.
    Grindon C; Combes R
    Altern Lab Anim; 2006 Mar; 34 Suppl 1():5-10. PubMed ID: 16555955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Regulatory assessment of chemicals within OECD member countries, EU and in Russia.
    Fjodorova N; Novich M; Vrachko M; Kharchevnikova N; Zholdakova Z; Sinitsyna O; Benfenati E
    J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev; 2008; 26(1):40-88. PubMed ID: 18322867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Health effects classification and its role in the derivation of minimal risk levels: developmental effects.
    Pohl HR; Smith-Simon C; Hicks H
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1998 Aug; 28(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 9784433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An enhanced tiered toxicity testing framework with triggers for assessing hazards and risks of commodity chemicals.
    Plunkett LM; Kaplan AM; Becker RA
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Dec; 58(3):382-94. PubMed ID: 20709129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An assessment of the developmental, reproductive, and neurotoxicity of endosulfan.
    Silva MH; Gammon D
    Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol; 2009 Feb; 86(1):1-28. PubMed ID: 19243027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Food and Drug Administration proposed testing guidelines for developmental toxicity studies. Revision Committee. FDA Guidelines for Developmental Toxicity and Reproduction, Food and Drug Administration.
    Collins TF; Sprando RL; Shackelford ME; Hansen DK; Welsh JJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1999 Aug; 30(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 10464045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Background of REACH in EU regulations on evaluation of chemicals.
    Foth H; Hayes A
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2008 Jun; 27(6):443-61. PubMed ID: 18784197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Alternative methods to safety studies in experimental animals: role in the risk assessment of chemicals under the new European Chemicals Legislation (REACH).
    Lilienblum W; Dekant W; Foth H; Gebel T; Hengstler JG; Kahl R; Kramer PJ; Schweinfurth H; Wollin KM
    Arch Toxicol; 2008 Apr; 82(4):211-36. PubMed ID: 18322675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Current developments in reproductive toxicity testing of pesticides.
    Cooper RL
    Reprod Toxicol; 2009 Sep; 28(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 19409482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Developmental neurotoxicity guideline study: issues with methodology, evaluation and regulation.
    Tsuji R; Crofton KM
    Congenit Anom (Kyoto); 2012 Sep; 52(3):122-8. PubMed ID: 22925212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Developmental toxicity testing of monoclonal antibodies: an enhanced pre- and postnatal study design option.
    Stewart J
    Reprod Toxicol; 2009 Sep; 28(2):220-5. PubMed ID: 19379807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Human developmental neurotoxicity of methylmercury: impact of variables and risk modifiers.
    Castoldi AF; Johansson C; Onishchenko N; Coccini T; Roda E; Vahter M; Ceccatelli S; Manzo L
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Jul; 51(2):201-14. PubMed ID: 18367301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Inhalation toxicity studies: OECD guidelines in relation to REACH and scientific developments.
    Arts JH; Muijser H; Jonker D; van de Sandt JJ; Bos PM; Feron VJ
    Exp Toxicol Pathol; 2008 Jun; 60(2-3):125-33. PubMed ID: 18455380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Integrated decision-tree testing strategies for developmental and reproductive toxicity with respect to the requirements of the EU REACH legislation.
    Grindon C; Combes R; Cronin MT; Roberts DW; Garrod JF
    Altern Lab Anim; 2008 Feb; 36(1):65-80. PubMed ID: 18333715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of study design and sex-differences on results from developmental neurotoxicity studies of bisphenol A: implications for toxicity testing.
    Beronius A; Johansson N; Rudén C; Hanberg A
    Toxicology; 2013 Sep; 311(1-2):13-26. PubMed ID: 23485653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.