BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16777433)

  • 1. Has the butcher on the bus dyed his hair? When color changes modulate ERP correlates of familiarity and recollection.
    Groh-Bordin C; Zimmer HD; Ecker UK
    Neuroimage; 2006 Oct; 32(4):1879-90. PubMed ID: 16777433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ERP correlates of source memory: unitized source information increases familiarity-based retrieval.
    Diana RA; Van den Boom W; Yonelinas AP; Ranganath C
    Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 1367():278-86. PubMed ID: 20965154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in familiarity and recollection across the lifespan: an ERP perspective.
    Friedman D; de Chastelaine M; Nessler D; Malcolm B
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1310():124-41. PubMed ID: 19914220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Familiarity in source memory.
    Mollison MV; Curran T
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Sep; 50(11):2546-65. PubMed ID: 22789677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrophysiological evidence for context reinstatement effects on object recognition memory.
    Miao J; Weigl M; Kong N; Zhao MF; Mecklinger A; Zheng Z; Li J
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2023 Dec; 206():107861. PubMed ID: 37944637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A meta-analysis of event-related potential correlates of recognition memory.
    Kwon S; Rugg MD; Wiegand R; Curran T; Morcom AM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Dec; 30(6):2083-2105. PubMed ID: 37434046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The late positive event-related potential component is time locked to the decision in recognition memory tasks.
    Sun J; Osth AF; Feuerriegel D
    Cortex; 2024 Jul; 176():194-208. PubMed ID: 38796921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Could masked conceptual primes increase recollection? The subtleties of measuring recollection and familiarity in recognition memory.
    Taylor JR; Henson RN
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Nov; 50(13):3027-40. PubMed ID: 22898644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Increased attention and memory for beloved-related information during infatuation: behavioral and electrophysiological data.
    Langeslag SJ; Olivier JR; Köhlen ME; Nijs IM; Van Strien JW
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2015 Jan; 10(1):136-44. PubMed ID: 24526182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The temporal dynamics of visual object priming.
    Ko PC; Duda B; Hussey EP; Mason EJ; Ally BA
    Brain Cogn; 2014 Nov; 91():11-20. PubMed ID: 25164991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recollection is fast and slow.
    Brainerd CJ; Nakamura K; Lee WA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):302-319. PubMed ID: 29698044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Observing memory encoding while it unfolds: Functional interpretation and current debates regarding ERP subsequent memory effects.
    Mecklinger A; Kamp SM
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2023 Oct; 153():105347. PubMed ID: 37543177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A within-subject ERP and fMRI investigation of orientation-specific recognition memory for pictures.
    Herzmann G; Jin M; Cordes D; Curran T
    Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Sep; 3(3-4):174-192. PubMed ID: 22984367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The testing effect for visual materials depends on preexisting knowledge.
    Ferreira CS; Wimber M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Oct; 49(10):1557-1571. PubMed ID: 37289510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An ERP measure of non-conscious memory reveals dissociable implicit processes in human recognition using an open-source automated analytic pipeline.
    Addante RJ; Lopez-Calderon J; Allen N; Luck C; Muller A; Sirianni L; Inman CS; Drane DL
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Oct; 60(10):e14334. PubMed ID: 37287106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recallable but not recognizable: The influence of semantic priming in recall paradigms.
    Ozubko JD; Sirianni LA; Ahmad FN; MacLeod CM; Addante RJ
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2021 Feb; 21(1):119-143. PubMed ID: 33409957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Brain Signatures of New (Pseudo-) Words: Visual Repetition in Associative and Non-associative Contexts.
    Bermúdez-Margaretto B; Beltrán D; Cuetos F; Domínguez A
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2018; 12():354. PubMed ID: 30233345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Format change and semantic relatedness effects on the ERP correlates of recognition: old pairs, new pairs, different stories.
    Guillaume F; Baier S; Bourgeois M; Tinard S
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Apr; 235(4):1007-1019. PubMed ID: 28032139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. FN400 and LPC memory effects for concrete and abstract words.
    Stróżak P; Bird CW; Corby K; Frishkoff G; Curran T
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Nov; 53(11):1669-1678. PubMed ID: 27463978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.