These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Cross-generational effects of habitat and density on life history in red deer. McLoughlin PD; Coulson T; Clutton-Brock T Ecology; 2008 Dec; 89(12):3317-26. PubMed ID: 19137939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The relationship between habitat choice and lifetime reproductive success in female red deer. Conradt L; Clutton-Brock TH; Guinness FE Oecologia; 1999 Aug; 120(2):218-224. PubMed ID: 28308082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lifetime reproductive success and composition of the home range in a large herbivore. McLoughlin PD; Gaillard JM; Boyce MS; Bonenfant C; Messier F; Duncan P; Delorme D; Van Moorter B; Saïd S; Klein F Ecology; 2007 Dec; 88(12):3192-201. PubMed ID: 18229853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term density-dependent changes in habitat selection in red deer (Cervus elaphus). Pérez-Barbería FJ; Hooper RJ; Gordon IJ Oecologia; 2013 Nov; 173(3):837-47. PubMed ID: 23719900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of the voluntary intake and digestion of a range of forages at different times of the year by the sheep and the red deer (Cervus elaphus). Milne JA; Macrae JC; Spence AM; Wilson S Br J Nutr; 1978 Sep; 40(2):347-57. PubMed ID: 698173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The relationship between tooth wear, habitat quality and late-life reproduction in a wild red deer population. Nussey DH; Metherell B; Moyes K; Donald A; Guinness FE; Clutton-Brock TH J Anim Ecol; 2007 Mar; 76(2):402-12. PubMed ID: 17302848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Early determinants of lifetime reproductive success differ between the sexes in red deer. Kruuk LE; Clutton-Brock TH; Rose KE; Guinness FE Proc Biol Sci; 1999 Aug; 266(1429):1655-61. PubMed ID: 10501037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Temporal scales, trade-offs, and functional responses in red deer habitat selection. Godvik IM; Loe LE; Vik JO; Veiberg V; Langvatn R; Mysterud A Ecology; 2009 Mar; 90(3):699-710. PubMed ID: 19341140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inbreeding depression influences lifetime breeding success in a wild population of red deer (Cervus elaphus). Slate J; Kruuk LE; Marshall TC; Pemberton JM; Clutton-Brock TH Proc Biol Sci; 2000 Aug; 267(1453):1657-62. PubMed ID: 11467429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Individual differences, density dependence and offspring birth traits in a population of red deer. Stopher KV; Pemberton JM; Clutton-Brock TH; Coulson T Proc Biol Sci; 2008 Sep; 275(1647):2137-45. PubMed ID: 18522909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Research on the influence of red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) grazing on grassland production in the south-eastern part of Slovenia. Trdan S; Vidrih M; Vesel A; Bobnar A Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2003; 68(4 Pt A):313-20. PubMed ID: 15149125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genetic consequences of human management in an introduced island population of red deer (Cervus elaphus). Nussey DH; Pemberton J; Donald A; Kruuk LE Heredity (Edinb); 2006 Jul; 97(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 16705323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Density-related changes in sexual selection in red deer. Clutton-Brock TH; Rose KE; Guinness FE Proc Biol Sci; 1997 Oct; 264(1387):1509-16. PubMed ID: 9364790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The reproductive performance of wild Scottish red deer, Cervus elaphus. Mitchell B J Reprod Fertil Suppl; 1973 Dec; 19():271-85. PubMed ID: 4522380 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Skewed distributions of lifetime reproductive success: beyond mean and variance. Tuljapurkar S; Zuo W; Coulson T; Horvitz C; Gaillard JM Ecol Lett; 2020 Apr; 23(4):748-756. PubMed ID: 32043827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The reproductive cycle of the female red deer, Cervus elaphus L. Guinness F; Lincoln GA; Short RV J Reprod Fertil; 1971 Dec; 27(3):427-38. PubMed ID: 5167355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Forage quantity, quality and depletion as scale-dependent mechanisms driving habitat selection of a large browsing herbivore. van Beest FM; Mysterud A; Loe LE; Milner JM J Anim Ecol; 2010 Jul; 79(4):910-22. PubMed ID: 20443990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Individual differences in reproductive costs examined using multi-state methods. Moyes K; Morgan B; Morris A; Morris S; Clutton-Brock T; Coulson T J Anim Ecol; 2011 Mar; 80(2):456-65. PubMed ID: 21182522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]