These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16778618)

  • 1. Agreement of multislice CT angiography and MR angiography in assessing the degree of carotid artery stenosis in consideration of different methods of postprocessing.
    Hackländer T; Wegner H; Hoppe S; Danckworth A; Kempkes U; Fischer M; Mertens H; Caldwell JH
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2006; 30(3):433-42. PubMed ID: 16778618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Grading of carotid artery stenosis in the presence of extensive calcifications: dual-energy CT angiography in comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    Korn A; Bender B; Brodoefel H; Hauser TK; Danz S; Ernemann U; Thomas C
    Clin Neuroradiol; 2015 Mar; 25(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 24343701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of carotid artery stenosis with multisection CT and MR imaging: influence of imaging modality and postprocessing.
    Lell M; Fellner C; Baum U; Hothorn T; Steiner R; Lang W; Bautz W; Fellner FA
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 17213434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How should we estimate carotid stenosis using magnetic resonance angiography?
    Vanninen RL; Manninen HI; Partanen PK; Tulla H; Vainio PA
    Neuroradiology; 1996 May; 38(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 8738083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection of carotid artery stenosis using histological specimens: a comparison of CT angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and Doppler ultrasonography.
    Netuka D; Belšán T; Broulíková K; Mandys V; Charvát F; Malík J; Coufalová L; Bradáč O; Ostrý S; Beneš V
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2016 Aug; 158(8):1505-14. PubMed ID: 27255656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MR imaging: influence of imaging technique and postprocessing on measurement of internal carotid artery stenosis.
    Runck F; Steiner RP; Bautz WA; Lell MM
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2008 Oct; 29(9):1736-42. PubMed ID: 18635618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
    Alvarez-Linera J; Benito-León J; Escribano J; Campollo J; Gesto R
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 May; 24(5):1012-9. PubMed ID: 12748115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modified Dual-Energy Algorithm for Calcified Plaque Removal: Evaluation in Carotid Computed Tomography Angiography and Comparison With Digital Subtraction Angiography.
    Mannil M; Ramachandran J; Vittoria de Martini I; Wegener S; Schmidt B; Flohr T; Krauss B; Valavanis A; Alkadhi H; Winklhofer S
    Invest Radiol; 2017 Nov; 52(11):680-685. PubMed ID: 28542096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic accuracy of colour Doppler ultrasonography, CT angiography and blood-pool-enhanced MR angiography in assessing carotid stenosis: a comparative study with DSA in 170 patients.
    Anzidei M; Napoli A; Zaccagna F; Di Paolo P; Saba L; Cavallo Marincola B; Zini C; Cartocci G; Di Mare L; Catalano C; Passariello R
    Radiol Med; 2012 Feb; 117(1):54-71. PubMed ID: 21424318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Dual-energy CT angiography for evaluation of internal carotid artery stenosis and occlusion].
    Chen Y; Xue HD; Jin ZY; Liu W; Sun H; Wang X; Zhao WM; Wang Y; Mu WB
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2009 Apr; 31(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 19507603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Assessment of cross-sectional area and diameter of carotid artery using time-of-flight MR angiography and CT angiography].
    Yasuda E; Miyati T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 21532247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Software-assisted CT-postprocessing of the carotid arteries].
    Gerhards A; Raab P; Herber S; Kreitner KF; Boskamp T; Mildenberger P
    Rofo; 2004 Jun; 176(6):870-4. PubMed ID: 15173982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computed tomography angiography-derived area stenosis calculations overestimate degree of carotid stenosis compared with North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial-derived diameter stenosis calculations.
    Arous EJ; Judelson DR; Agrawal A; Dundamadappa SK; Crawford AS; Malka KT; Simons JP; Schanzer A
    J Vasc Surg; 2021 Aug; 74(2):579-585.e2. PubMed ID: 33548432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography.
    Randoux B; Marro B; Koskas F; Duyme M; Sahel M; Zouaoui A; Marsault C
    Radiology; 2001 Jul; 220(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 11425993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective evaluation of extracranial carotid stenosis: MR angiography with maximum-intensity projections and multiplanar reformation compared with conventional angiography.
    De Marco JK; Nesbit GM; Wesbey GE; Richardson D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1205-12. PubMed ID: 7976902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Carotid stenosis evaluation by 64-slice CTA: comparison of NASCET, ECST and CC grading methods.
    Kılıçkap G; Ergun E; Başbay E; Koşar P; Kosar U
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Jun; 28(5):1257-66. PubMed ID: 21858656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing internal carotid artery stenosis with a semiautomated computed tomography angiography tool and duplex ultrasound.
    Müller M; Agten CA; Österreich M; Hoffmann M
    J Vasc Surg; 2015 Jun; 61(6):1449-56. PubMed ID: 25776187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Carotid bifurcation CT angiography: assessment of interactive volume rendering.
    Verhoek G; Costello P; Khoo EW; Wu R; Kat E; Fitridge RA
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1999; 23(4):590-6. PubMed ID: 10433292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography.
    Sundgren PC; Sundén P; Lindgren A; Lanke J; Holtås S; Larsson EM
    Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical usefulness of and problems with three-dimensional CT angiography for the evaluation of arteriosclerotic stenosis of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional angiography, MRA, and ultrasound sonography.
    Sameshima T; Futami S; Morita Y; Yokogami K; Miyahara S; Sameshima Y; Goya T; Wakisaka S
    Surg Neurol; 1999 Mar; 51(3):301-8; discussion 308-9. PubMed ID: 10086495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.