312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16778638)
1. Agreement in assessing cup-to-disc ratio measurement among stereoscopic optic nerve head photographs, HRT II, and Stratus OCT.
Arthur SN; Aldridge AJ; De León-Ortega J; McGwin G; Xie A; Girkin CA
J Glaucoma; 2006 Jun; 15(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 16778638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the optic nerve imaging by time-domain optical coherence tomography and Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography in distinguishing normal eyes from those with glaucoma.
Kim NR; Kim JH; Kim CY; Jun I; Seong GJ; Lee ES
J Glaucoma; 2013 Jan; 22(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 21623218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optic disc imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: variability and agreement study with Heidelberg retinal tomograph.
Yang B; Ye C; Yu M; Liu S; Lam DS; Leung CK
Ophthalmology; 2012 Sep; 119(9):1852-7. PubMed ID: 22572035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Agreement between stereoscopic photographs, clinical assessment, Heidelberg retina tomograph and digital stereoscopic optic disc camera in estimating vertical cup:disc ratio.
Jayasundera T; Danesh-Meyer HV; Donaldson M; Gamble G
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Jun; 33(3):259-63. PubMed ID: 15932529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of cup-to-disc ratio with slit-lamp funduscopy, Heidelberg Retina Tomography II, and stereoscopic photos.
Durmus M; Karadag R; Erdurmus M; Totan Y; Feyzi Hepsen I
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 19123149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differences in Optical Coherence Tomography Assessment of Bruch Membrane Opening Compared to Stereoscopic Photography for Estimating Cup-to-Disc Ratio.
Mwanza JC; Huang LY; Budenz DL; Shi W; Huang G; Lee RK
Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Dec; 184():34-41. PubMed ID: 28964804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cup-to-disc ratio: agreement between slit-lamp indirect ophthalmoscopic estimation and stratus optical coherence tomography measurement.
Arnalich-Montiel F; Muñoz-Negrete FJ; Rebolleda G; Sales-Sanz M; Cabarga C
Eye (Lond); 2007 Aug; 21(8):1041-9. PubMed ID: 16680099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cup-to-Disc Ratio From Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 and High-Definition Optical Coherence Tomography Agrees Poorly With Clinical Assessment.
Perera SA; Foo LL; Cheung CY; Allen JC; Chua D; Tham YC; Loon SC; Wong TY; Aung T
J Glaucoma; 2016 Feb; 25(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 25827299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography a study on diagnostic agreement with Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph.
Leung CK; Ye C; Weinreb RN; Cheung CY; Qiu Q; Liu S; Xu G; Lam DS
Ophthalmology; 2010 Feb; 117(2):267-74. PubMed ID: 19969364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Agreement in assessing glaucomatous discs in a clinical teaching setting with stereoscopic disc photographs, planimetry, and laser scanning tomography.
Hatch WV; Trope GE; Buys YM; Macken P; Etchells EE; Flanagan JG
J Glaucoma; 1999 Apr; 8(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 10209725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of optic nerve head parameter measurements obtained by time-domain and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.
Savini G; Barboni P; Carbonelli M; Sbreglia A; Deluigi G; Parisi V
J Glaucoma; 2013; 22(5):384-9. PubMed ID: 22366702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optic disc imaging in perimetrically normal eyes of glaucoma patients with unilateral field loss.
Caprioli J; Nouri-Mahdavi K; Law SK; Badalà F
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2006; 104():202-11. PubMed ID: 17471341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variability of vertical cup to disc ratio measurement and the effects of glaucoma 5-year risk estimation in untreated ocular hypertensive eyes.
Chan PP; Chiu V; Wong MO
Br J Ophthalmol; 2019 Mar; 103(3):361-368. PubMed ID: 29858183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of cup-to-disc ratio estimates by fundus biomicroscopy and stereoscopic optic disc photography in the Tema Eye Survey.
Mwanza JC; Grover DS; Budenz DL; Herndon LW; Nolan W; Whiteside-de Vos J; Hay-Smith G; Bandi JR; Bhansali KA; Forbes LA; Feuer WJ; Barton K
Eye (Lond); 2017 Aug; 31(8):1184-1190. PubMed ID: 28387768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of glaucomatous damage on repeatability of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, scanning laser polarimetry, and optical coherence tomography.
DeLeón Ortega JE; Sakata LM; Kakati B; McGwin G; Monheit BE; Arthur SN; Girkin CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1156-63. PubMed ID: 17325159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Glaucoma diagnostics.
Geimer SA
Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 91 Thesis 1():1-32. PubMed ID: 23384049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Glaucoma diagnosis optic disc analysis comparing Cirrus spectral domain optical coherence tomography and Heidelberg retina tomograph II.
Shin HY; Park HY; Jung KI; Park CK
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2013 Jan; 57(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 23104685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the GDx VCC scanning laser polarimeter, HRT II confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, and stratus OCT optical coherence tomograph for the detection of glaucoma.
Medeiros FA; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Weinreb RN
Arch Ophthalmol; 2004 Jun; 122(6):827-37. PubMed ID: 15197057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Morphometric assessment of normal, suspect and glaucomatous optic discs with Stratus OCT and HRT II.
Iliev ME; Meyenberg A; Garweg JG
Eye (Lond); 2006 Nov; 20(11):1288-99. PubMed ID: 16179933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of quantitative imaging devices and subjective optic nerve head assessment by general ophthalmologists to differentiate normal from glaucomatous eyes.
Vessani RM; Moritz R; Batis L; Zagui RB; Bernardoni S; Susanna R
J Glaucoma; 2009 Mar; 18(3):253-61. PubMed ID: 19295383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
