These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16779110)

  • 1. Evolution and use of a note classification scheme in an electronic medical record.
    Payne TH; Kalus R; Zehner J
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2005; 2005():599-603. PubMed ID: 16779110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Creating a note classification scheme for a multi-institutional electronic medical record.
    Payne TH; Gaster B; Mineer D; Mazurk J; Dunnington N; Zehner J; Lober B; Van Eaton E; McCormick W
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2003; 2003():968. PubMed ID: 14728472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The transition to electronic documentation on a teaching hospital medical service.
    Payne TH; Perkins M; Kalus R; Reilly D
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():629-33. PubMed ID: 17238417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Facilitating transitions to EMR adoption through client-side electronic documentation.
    Jernigan M; Lester W
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2007 Oct; ():992. PubMed ID: 18694092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Template-based data entry for general description in medical records and data transfer to data warehouse for analysis.
    Matsumura Y; Kuwata S; Yamamoto Y; Izumi K; Okada Y; Hazumi M; Yoshimoto S; Mineno T; Nagahama M; Fujii A; Takeda H
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 1):412-6. PubMed ID: 17911750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Structured electronic operative reporting: comparison with dictation in kidney cancer surgery.
    Hoffer DN; Finelli A; Chow R; Liu J; Truong T; Lane K; Punnen S; Knox JJ; Legere L; Kurban G; Gallie B; Jewett MA
    Int J Med Inform; 2012 Mar; 81(3):182-91. PubMed ID: 22217801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The lexeme hypotheses: Their use to generate highly grammatical and completely computerized medical records.
    Macfarlane D
    Med Hypotheses; 2016 Jul; 92():75-9. PubMed ID: 27241262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A web based prototype system for patient use confirming Taiwan electronic medical-record templates.
    Hu CM; Jian WS; Chang PL; Hsu CY
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2005; 2005():987. PubMed ID: 16779274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Utilization of multimedia-based prototype system for patient electronic medical record.
    Chu YC; Jian WS; Yen LP; Chang P
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():890. PubMed ID: 17238509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing usage patterns of electronic clinical documentation templates.
    Vawdrey DK
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2008 Nov; 2008():758-62. PubMed ID: 18998863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Direct text entry in electronic progress notes. An evaluation of input errors.
    Weir CR; Hurdle JF; Felgar MA; Hoffman JM; Roth B; Nebeker JR
    Methods Inf Med; 2003; 42(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 12695797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pre-post evaluation of physicians' satisfaction with a redesigned electronic medical record system.
    Jaspers MW; Peute LW; Lauteslager A; Bakker PJ
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 136():303-8. PubMed ID: 18487748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The evolution of office notes and the electronic medical record: The CAPS note.
    Styron JF; Evans PJ
    Cleve Clin J Med; 2016 Jul; 83(7):542-4. PubMed ID: 27399867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. No paper, but the same routines: a qualitative exploration of experiences in two Norwegian hospitals deprived of the paper based medical record.
    Lium JT; Tjora A; Faxvaag A
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2008 Jan; 8():2. PubMed ID: 18186935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the impact of structured text and templates in ambulatory nursing.
    Crist-Grundman D; Douglas K; Kern V; Gregory J; Switzer V
    Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care; 1995; ():712-6. PubMed ID: 8563381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Derivation and evaluation of a document-naming nomenclature.
    Brown SH; Lincoln M; Hardenbrook S; Petukhova ON; Rosenbloom ST; Carpenter P; Elkin P
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2001; 8(4):379-90. PubMed ID: 11418545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An integrated billing application to streamline clinician workflow.
    Vawdrey DK; Walsh C; Stetson PD
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2014; 2014():1141-9. PubMed ID: 25954425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An experimental system for comparing speed, accuracy, and completeness of physician data entry using electronic and paper methods.
    Chiang MF; Cao H; Sharda P; Hripcsak G; Starren JB
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2003; 2003():812. PubMed ID: 14728317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transition from paper to electronic inpatient physician notes.
    Payne TH; tenBroek AE; Fletcher GS; Labuguen MC
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2010; 17(1):108-11. PubMed ID: 20064811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prevalence and Sources of Duplicate Information in the Electronic Medical Record.
    Steinkamp J; Kantrowitz JJ; Airan-Javia S
    JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Sep; 5(9):e2233348. PubMed ID: 36156143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.