451 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16779971)
1. A comparison between the shear bond strength of brackets bonded to glazed and deglazed porcelain surfaces with resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement and a bis-GMA resin adhesive.
Lifshitz AB; Cárdenas M
World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 16779971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Orthodontic bracket bonding with a plasma-arc light and resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement.
Ishikawa H; Komori A; Kojima I; Ando F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jul; 120(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 11455379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bonding to densely sintered alumina surfaces: effect of sandblasting and silica coating on shear bond strength of luting cements.
Blixt M; Adamczak E; Lindén LA; Odén A; Arvidson K
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 11203636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of conventional and high-intensity light-curing on enamel shear bond strength of composite resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer.
Sfondrini MF; Cacciafesta V; Pistorio A; Sfondrini G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 11174537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Demineralization around orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement and fluoride-releasing resin composite.
Wilson RM; Donly KJ
Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 11447960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of shear bond strength of three bonding agents with metal and ceramic brackets.
Haydar B; Sarikaya S; Cehreli ZC
Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):457-62. PubMed ID: 10515144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and glass-filled GIC.
Rix D; Foley TF; Mamandras A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 11174538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Shear bond strengths of two resin-modified glass ionomer cements to porcelain.
Chung CH; Brendlinger EJ; Brendlinger DL; Bernal V; Mante FK
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 May; 115(5):533-5. PubMed ID: 10229885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Shear bond strength of composite, glass ionomer, and acidic primer adhesive systems.
Bishara SE; Gordan VV; VonWald L; Jakobsen JR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jan; 115(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 9878954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Shear bond strength of stainless steel orthodontic brackets with a moisture-insensitive primer.
Grandhi RK; Combe EC; Speidel TM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Mar; 119(3):251-5. PubMed ID: 11244419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An in vitro comparison of four surface preparation techniques for veneering a compomer to stainless steel.
Salama FS; el-Mallakh BF
Pediatr Dent; 1997; 19(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 9200199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of saliva and water contamination on the enamel shear bond strength of a light-cured glass ionomer cement.
Cacciafesta V; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Süssenberger U; Miethke RR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Apr; 113(4):402-7. PubMed ID: 9563355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Orthodontic brackets bonded to glazed and deglazed porcelain surfaces.
Nebbe B; Stein E
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Apr; 109(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 8638585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of shear bond strengths of three visible light-cured orthodontic adhesives.
Owens SE; Miller BH
Angle Orthod; 2000 Oct; 70(5):352-6. PubMed ID: 11036994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of altering the type of enamel conditioner on the shear bond strength of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer adhesive.
Bishara SE; Vonwald L; Laffoon JF; Jakobsen JR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Sep; 118(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 10982929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of orthodontic adhesive properties on the quality of orthodontic attachment.
Knox J; Jones ML; Hubsch P; Middleton J
Angle Orthod; 2000 Jun; 70(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 10926434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of light-cure time on the initial shear bond strength of a glass-ionomer adhesive.
Bishara SE; VonWald L; Olsen ME; Laffoon JF; Jakobsen JR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Feb; 117(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 10672216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative assessment of light-cured resin-modified glass ionomer and composite resin adhesives: in vitro study of a new adhesive system.
Newman GV; Newman RA; Sengupta AK
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Mar; 119(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 11244420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
