These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. [Methods for bonding Incognito brackets using a photo-polymerizable bonding agent]. Cuzin JF; Simon JS Orthod Fr; 2009 Jun; 80(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 19552881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Specific bonding technics]. Sorel O; Mano MC; Mehdi S Orthod Fr; 2009 Jun; 80(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 19552878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Indirect bonding with a flowable light-cured adhesive. Miles PG J Clin Orthod; 2002 Nov; 36(11):646-7. PubMed ID: 12514856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Indirect bonding technics]. Sorel O; Mehdi S; Mano MC Orthod Fr; 2009 Jun; 80(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 19552882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Porcelain surface conditioning protocols and shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Lestrade AM; Ballard RW; Xu X; Yu Q; Kee EL; Armbruster PC Aust Orthod J; 2016 May; 32(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 27468587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of light-emitting diode and halogen light curing techniques on ceramic brackets bonded to porcelain surfaces. Türkkahraman H; Küçükeşmen HC Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):673-6. PubMed ID: 16808576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vivo effects of amorphous calcium phosphate-containing orthodontic composite on enamel demineralization around orthodontic brackets. Uysal T; Amasyali M; Ozcan S; Koyuturk AE; Akyol M; Sagdic D Aust Dent J; 2010 Sep; 55(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 20887516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of bracket bonding using two different polymerization sources. Koupis NS; Eliades T; Athanasiou AE Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):922-5. PubMed ID: 18298204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of enamel surfaces after bracket debonding: an in-vivo study with scanning electron microscopy. Alessandri Bonetti G; Zanarini M; Incerti Parenti S; Lattuca M; Marchionni S; Gatto MR Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):696-702. PubMed ID: 22051490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rebonding of orthodontic brackets. Part I, a laboratory and clinical study. Montasser MA; Drummond JL; Evans CA Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):531-6. PubMed ID: 18416614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In-vivo evaluation of the surface roughness and morphology of enamel after bracket removal and polishing by different techniques. Faria-Júnior ÉM; Guiraldo RD; Berger SB; Correr AB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Contreras EF; Lopes MB Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Mar; 147(3):324-9. PubMed ID: 25726399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Etching masks for precise indirect bonding. Cozzani M; Menini A; Bertelli A J Clin Orthod; 2010 May; 44(5):326-30. PubMed ID: 20831102 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Shear bond strength of brackets bonded to amalgam with different intermediate resins and adhesives. Germec D; Cakan U; Ozdemir FI; Arun T; Cakan M Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 19073953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to porcelain following etching with Er:YAG laser versus hydrofluoric acid. Yassaei S; Moradi F; Aghili H; Kamran MH Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e82-7. PubMed ID: 23646342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]